Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maurício C. de Oliveira

dblp:24/6257 · also Maurício Carvalho de Oliveira · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-1482-2123ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Systems, architecture and hardware · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 71% Motion planning and robot control · 14% Robot manipulation · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.212014
DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
locomotion
0.212014
DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot
tensegrity robot
0.212014
DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics
0.112014
DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112014
DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter optimization · 0.8geometric constraint analysis · 0.8physics simulation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Design and Parameter Optimization of a 3-PSR Parallel Mechanism for Replicating Wave and Boat Motion
abstract
We present a low-cost, three-degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) prismatic-spherical-revolute (PSR) parallel mechanism used as a testing platform for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) tethered to an unmanned surface vehicle (USV). The mechanism has three actuated linear rails kinematically linked to a platform which replicates boat motion up to 2.5 m vertical heave (sea state 4, Douglas Sea Scale). A lookup table relating relative slider heights to platform roll and pitch was developed numerically leveraging geometric constraints. A design parameter study optimized the arm length, platform size, and ball joint mounting angle relative to the overall radius to maximize the workspace. For this design, a maximum roll and pitch range from -32° to 32° and -25° to 35°, respectively, is achievable. A prototype was manufactured to carry the tethered UAV winch payload. Experimental testing confirmed the workspace and demonstrated boat motion replication, validated using an inertial measurement unit (IMU).
Kurt A. Talke, Dylan Drotman, Nicholas Stroumtsos, Maurício C. de Oliveira, Thomas R. Bewley
ICRA4
2018 Catenary Tether Shape Analysis for a UAV - USV Team
abstract
The quasi-static catenary curve of a semi-slack tether between an essentially stationary unmanned air vehicle (UAV) and a small unmanned surface vehicle (USV) is investigated and characterized. An empirical analysis, performed over a discretized space of vertical and horizontal separations of the two vehicles, determines an optimum cable length & tension for maximizing system robustness during the vertical heave of the USV due to high seas. Operating at this optimum condition allows for equal displacements of the USV in the up and down directions, minimizing the possibility of both fouling (with the tether touching the water) and excessive downforce on the UAV (with the tether pulled taut) during dynamic heave events. Scaling the horizontal offset, tether length, and tension by the flying height collapses all empirical results into convenient curves depending only on a nondimensional relative position parameter (Δx/Δy), accurately fit by low order polynomials. This eliminates the need for a lookup table, and decreases computation time during implementation. The heave robustness analysis results in a recommended operating relative position of Δx/Δy ≈ .46. Experimental results are presented and confirm the catenary analysis for the proposed tether.
Kurt A. Talke, Maurício C. de Oliveira, Thomas R. Bewley
IROS2
2014 DuCTT: A tensegrity robot for exploring duct systems
abstract
A robot with the ability to traverse complex duct systems requires a large range of controllable motions as well as the ability to grip the duct walls in vertical shafts. We present a tensegrity robot with two linked tetrahedral frames, each containing a linear actuator, connected by a system of eight actuated cables. The robot climbs by alternately wedging each tetrahedron within the duct and moving one tetrahedron relative to the other. We first introduce our physical prototype, called DuCTT (Duct Climbing Tetrahedral Tensegrity). We next discuss the inverse kinematic control strategy used to actuate the robot and analyze the controller's capabilities within a physics simulation. Finally, we discuss the hardware prototype and compare its performance with simulation.
Jeffrey M. Friesen, Alexandra Pogue, Thomas R. Bewley, Maurício C. de Oliveira, Robert E. Skelton, Vytas SunSpiral
ICRA4
2011 Exact motion planning solution for principally kinematic systems
abstract
In this paper, we take a rather new approach to solving the motion planning problem for principally kinematic systems, that is, systems whose dynamics is completely specified by the right number of nonholonomic constraints. Given a planar curve in the Special Euclidean group, we analytically solve for the base variables that locomote the principally kinematic system along the specified curve.
Elie A. Shammas, Maurício C. de Oliveira
IROS2