Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sven Meyer zu Eissen

dblp:24/6872 · also Sven Meyer zu Eißen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 70% Indexing and storage engines · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines › vector index
fingerprint index
0.112007
Strategies for retrieving plagiarized documents · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval
indexing
0.112007
Strategies for retrieving plagiarized documents · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › text reuse detection
plagiarism detection
0.112007
Strategies for retrieving plagiarized documents · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.012007
Strategies for retrieving plagiarized documents · SIGIR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic sampling · 0.1n-gram indexing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Strategies for retrieving plagiarized documents
abstract
For the identification of plagiarized passages in large document collections we present retrieval strategies which rely on stochastic sampling and chunk indexes. Using the entire Wikipedia corpus we compile n-gram indexes and compare them to a new kind of fingerprint index in a plagiarism analysis use case. Our index provides an analysis speed-up by factor 1.5 and is an order of magnitude smaller, while being equivalent in terms of precision and recall.
Benno Stein 0001, Sven Meyer zu Eissen, Martin Potthast
SIGIR2
2006 Is Web Genre Identification Feasible?
Benno Stein 0001, Sven Meyer zu Eissen
ECAI2
2006 Intrinsic Plagiarism Detection
Sven Meyer zu Eissen, Benno Stein 0001
ECIR1