Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Motoyoshi Fujiwara

dblp:24/8072 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 88% Motion planning and robot control · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulator kinematics
manipulability analysis
0.012002
Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism using Manipulability · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation
parallel manipulator
0.012002
Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism using Manipulability · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
actuator configuration
0.012002
Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism using Manipulability · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
kinematic modeling
0.012002
Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism using Manipulability · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

singular value decomposition · 0.0manipulability ellipsoid · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism using Manipulability
abstract
The linear-actuated parallel mechanism that changes the motion characteristic according to the actuator configuration is known. The authors previously (2000) reported on the kinematics and the motion characteristic on the basis of the motion transmissibility. In this report, we analyze the changed in motion characteristics using the measures of manipulability. Indices of manipulability are given with components of the value determined by the singular value decomposition. The typical index is a volume of the manipulability ellipsoid. We clarify the features of the motion characteristics according to a change in the actuator configuration using these indices. Finally, we show the recommended application examples that are designed for mechanisms using the obtained result.
Takanori Masuda, Motoyoshi Fujiwara, Norihiko Kato, Tatsuo Arai
ICRA2
2000 Specific kinematic changes in a linear-actuated parallel mechanism according to differences in actuator arrangement
abstract
Parallel mechanisms driven by fixed linear actuators promise high speed and high output, thanks to lightweight movable parts. Several types of mechanism applying this mechanical principle are already known. Although these have different methods of actuator arrangement, they may be considered the same mechanism since they can be treated using the same kinematics. However, it is not known how the output characteristics differ with differences in actuator arrangement. The article first shows the general kinematics that can be applied regardless of actuator arrangement. Next, changes are shown in the output characteristics occurring with changes in the actuator layout angle in a linear-actuated parallel mechanism with validity arranged actuators. The movable space and motion transmission indexes were used to determine the output characteristics. A total transmission index integrating the transmission index into the movable space is proposed, and the effects of design parameters other than actuator layout angle were investigated while giving weight to the motion transmissibility. The results show that the best actuator layout angle is 45-75 (deg).
Takanori Masuda, Motoyoshi Fujiwara, Tatsuo Arai
IROS2
1999 Pseudo contact point monitoring for contact state estimation
abstract
Contact state information is indispensable for performing skillful tasks in which an end-effector should be in contact with the environment. In previous work, the authors introduced the concept of a pseudo contact point that is useful for tasks involving contact as one expression of the contact state. In this paper, an extended definition of the pseudo contact point is proposed. The pseudo contact point is defined as the foot of the perpendicular from the nearest point on a reference object to the line on which the contact point and external force vector lie. The system may estimate the contact state and its transitions by monitoring the pseudo contact point in spite of the fact that the pseudo contact point does not always denote the real contact point. Experimental results suggest the effectiveness of our method, which is particularly valuable in providing an intuitive positional description of a contact state.
Kosei Kitagaki, Motoyoshi Fujiwara, Takashi Suehiro, Tsukasa Ogasawara
IROS2