Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chandan Prakash
dblp:241/8183
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0401-0356ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019 |
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements elicitation
requirements extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 0.4semantic querying · 0.4natural language processing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | From Regulatory Text to Executable Configuration: A Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Automated Enterprise Software Systems
Chandan Prakash, Pavan Kumar Chittimalli, Ravindra Naik |
ENASE (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business RulesabstractAn enterprise system operates business by providing various services that are guided by set of certain business rules (BR) and constraints. These BR are usually written using plain Natural Language in operating procedures, terms and conditions, and other documents or in source code of legacy enterprise systems. For implementing the BR in a software system, expressing them as UML use-case specifications, or preparing for Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity, analysts manually interpret the documents or try to identify constraints from the source code, leading to potential discrepancies and ambiguities. These issues in the software system can be resolved only after testing, which is a very tedious and expensive activity. To minimize such errors and efforts, we propose BuRRiTo framework consisting of automatic extraction of BR by mining documents and source code, ability to clean them of various anomalies like inconsistency, redundancies, conflicts, etc. and able to analyze the functional gaps present and performing semantic querying and searching. Pavan Kumar Chittimalli, Kritika Anand, Shrishti Pradhan, Sayandeep Mitra, Chandan Prakash, Rohit Shere, Ravindra Naik |
ASE | 5 |
| 2018 | MatGap: A Systematic Approach to Perform Match and Gap Analysis among SBVR-Based Domain Specific Business RulesabstractIn the modern age, the need for automation has led to Business Organizations representing their functionality as structured Business Rules. SBVR has come up as an universally popular format for representation of Business Rules. The presence of different Business Organizations working in a particular real life domain results in generation of different rules for each of the organization. Due to the varying business practices, like mergers & acquisitions, upgrades, incorporation of a new application, etc., it becomes necessary to compare a set of Business Rules of a particular organization with the rules of a reference model, to get a measure of similarity among the business functionality of the two. Presently, this comparison is carried out manually by business experts or by executing the rules of one organization with the data of another and checking if they are compliant. Both the approaches are extremely tedious and expensive as modern organizations have huge rule sets and data sets.We present MatGap, a tool which performs a systematic Match and Gap Analysis between two sets of SBVR-based Business Rules applicable to a specific domain, using Global Vectors(GloVe) model and SMT-LIBv2. The analysis report gives a measure of Match among the rules and entities, thus providing the best alignment and aids to identify the representational Gaps(if any) among the rules and entities. The tool also checks whether the embedded logic in the reference Business Rule set is covered by the other Rule set, thus highlighting the business functionality gap that is present in the latter. Sayandeep Mitra, Chandan Prakash, Shayak Chakraborty, Pavan Kumar Chittimalli |
APSEC | 2 |