Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anton Sinitsin
dblp:241/9340
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Graph learning · 11% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
parallel decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
parallel inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed Deep Learning In Open Collaborations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed Deep Learning In Open Collaborations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Editable Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning to Route in Similarity Graphs · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
concurrent attention cache · 1.7rotary position embeddings · 0.9rotary position embedding · 0.9learned routing function · 0.8greedy routing · 0.8SwAV pretraining · 0.5ALBERT pretraining · 0.5constrained fine-tuning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent AttentionabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to tackle increasingly complex tasks through advanced reasoning, long-form content generation, and tool use. Solving these tasks often involves long inference-time computations. In human problem solving, a common strategy to expedite work is collaboration: by dividing the problem into sub-tasks, exploring different strategies concurrently, etc. Recent research has shown that LLMs can also operate in parallel by implementing explicit cooperation frameworks, such as voting mechanisms or the explicit creation of independent sub-tasks that can be executed in parallel. However, each of these frameworks may not be suitable for all types of tasks, which can hinder their applicability. In this work, we propose a different design approach: we run LLM "workers" in parallel , allowing them to synchronize via a concurrently-updated attention cache and prompt these workers to decide how best to collaborate. Our approach allows the instances to come up with their own collaboration strategy for the problem at hand, all the while "seeing" each other's partial progress in the concurrent cache. We implement this approach via Hogwild! Inference: a parallel LLM inference engine where multiple instances of the same LLM run in parallel with the same attention cache, with "instant" access to each other's generated tokens. Hogwild! inference takes advantage of Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) to avoid recomputation while improving parallel hardware utilization. We find that modern reasoning-capable LLMs can perform inference with shared Key-Value cache out of the box, without additional fine-tuning. Gleb Rodionov, Roman Garipov, Alina Shutova, George Yakushev, Erik Schultheis, Vage Egiazarian, Anton Sinitsin, Denis Kuznedelev, Dan Alistarh |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2021 | Distributed Deep Learning In Open CollaborationsabstractModern deep learning applications require increasingly more compute to train state-of-the-art models. To address this demand, large corporations and institutions use dedicated High-Performance Computing clusters, whose construction and maintenance are both environmentally costly and well beyond the budget of most organizations. As a result, some research directions become the exclusive domain of a few large industrial and even fewer academic actors. To alleviate this disparity, smaller groups may pool their computational resources and run collaborative experiments that benefit all participants. This paradigm, known as grid- or volunteer computing, has seen successful applications in numerous scientific areas. However, using this approach for machine learning is difficult due to high latency, asymmetric bandwidth, and several challenges unique to volunteer computing. In this work, we carefully analyze these constraints and propose a novel algorithmic framework designed specifically for collaborative training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for SwAV and ALBERT pretraining in realistic conditions and achieve performance comparable to traditional setups at a fraction of the cost. Finally, we provide a detailed report of successful collaborative language model pretraining with nearly 50 participants. Michael Diskin, Alexey Bukhtiyarov, Max Ryabinin, Lucile Saulnier, Quentin Lhoest, Anton Sinitsin, Dmitry Popov 0003, Dmitry V. Pyrkin, Maxim Kashirin, Alexander Borzunov, Albert Villanova del Moral, Denis Mazur, Ilia Kobelev, Yacine Jernite, Thomas Wolf 0008, Gennady Pekhimenko |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2020 | Editable Neural Networks
Anton Sinitsin, Vsevolod Plokhotnyuk, Dmitry V. Pyrkin, Sergei Popov, Artem Babenko |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning to Route in Similarity GraphsabstractRecently similarity graphs became the leading paradigm for efficient nearest neighbor search, outperforming traditional tree-based and LSH-based methods. Similarity graphs perform the search via greedy routing: a query traverses the graph and in each vertex moves to the adjacent vertex that is the closest to this query. In practice, similarity graphs are often susceptible to local minima, when queries do not reach its nearest neighbors, getting stuck in suboptimal vertices. In this paper we propose to learn the routing function that overcomes local minima via incorporating information about the graph global structure. In particular, we augment the vertices of a given graph with additional representations that are learned to provide the optimal routing from the start vertex to the query nearest neighbor. By thorough experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed learnable routing successfully diminishes the local minima problem and significantly improves the overall search performance. Dmitry Baranchuk, Dmitry Persiyanov, Anton Sinitsin, Artem Babenko |
ICML | 3 |