Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Hildebrandt

dblp:242/2095 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5564-0126ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › affective interaction
affective robotics
0.512021
Drone in Love: Emotional Perception of Facial Expressions on Flying Robots · CHI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical study · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SPAT: Situational Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior Perception in Traffic Scale
abstract
Automated vehicles (AVs) reached technological maturity and will soon arrive on streets as traffic participants.Human traffic participants such as drivers, pedestrians, or cyclists will be increasingly confronted with the presence of AVs within their environment, not necessarily knowing or understanding what to expect and how to interact with them.Although AVs are designed to act safely, effective interaction in mixed traffic scenarios will depend on successful communication, interaction, or even negotiation beyond static rules and regulations.Prosocial behavior, such as yielding one's right of way, will be needed to resolve unclear traffic situations or foster traffic flow.However, what are the characteristics of such prosocial behavior, and how to measure this not only for automated vehicles
Hatice Sahin Ippoliti, Mark Colley, Debargha Dey, Philipp Wintersberger, Shadan Sadeghian, Andreas Löcken, Andrii Matviienko, Azra Habibovic, Heiko Müller 0002, Andrea Hildebrandt, Susanne Boll
AutomotiveUI10
2021 Drone in Love: Emotional Perception of Facial Expressions on Flying Robots
abstract
Drones are rapidly populating human spaces, yet little is known about how these flying robots are perceived and understood by humans. Recent works suggested that their acceptance is predicated upon their sociability. This paper explores the use of facial expressions to represent emotions on social drones. We leveraged design practices from ground robotics and created a set of rendered robotic faces that convey basic emotions. We evaluated individuals’ response to these emotional facial expressions on drones in two empirical studies (N = 98, N = 98). Our results demonstrate that individuals accurately recognize five drone emotional expressions, as well as make sense of intensities within emotion categories. We describe how participants were emotionally affected by the drone, showed empathy towards it, and created narratives to interpret its emotions. As a consequence, we formulate design recommendations for social drones and discuss methodological insights on the use of static versus dynamic stimuli in affective robotics studies.
Viviane Herdel, Anastasia Kuzminykh, Andrea Hildebrandt, Jessica R. Cauchard
CHI3