Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Burcu Karagol Ayan

dblp:242/4274 · also Burcu Karagol-Ayan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 46% Vision and language · 30% Question answering and dialogue systems · 10%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning › description generation
detailed image description
0.812024
ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.812024
ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.612022
Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation › conditional image synthesis
text-conditioned image synthesis
0.612022
Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.612022
Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.612022
Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › semantic interpretation
presupposition
0.512021
Which Linguist Invented the Lightbulb? Presupposition Verification for Question-Answering · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal language model · 0.8large language model · 0.6diffusion model · 0.6classifier-free guidance · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptions
abstract
Roopal Garg, Andrea Burns, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Yonatan Bitton, Ceslee Montgomery, Yasumasa Onoe, Andrew Bunner, Ranjay Krishna, Jason Michael Baldridge, Radu Soricut. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Roopal Garg, Andrea Burns, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Yonatan Bitton, Ceslee Montgomery, Yasumasa Onoe, Andrew Bunner, Ranjay Krishna, Jason Baldridge, Radu Soricut
EMNLP3
2022 Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding
abstract
We present Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model with an unprecedented degree of photorealism and a deep level of language understanding. Imagen builds on the power of large transformer language models in understanding text and hinges on the strength of diffusion models in high-fidelity image generation. Our key discovery is that generic large language models (e.g., T5), pretrained on text-only corpora, are surprisingly effective at encoding text for image synthesis: increasing the size of the language model in Imagen boosts both sample fidelity and image-text alignment much more than increasing the size of the image diffusion model. Imagen achieves a new state-of-the-art FID score of 7.27 on the COCO dataset, without ever training on COCO, and human raters find Imagen samples to be on par with the COCO data itself in image-text alignment. To assess text-to-image models in greater depth, we introduce DrawBench, a comprehensive and challenging benchmark for text-to-image models. With DrawBench, we compare Imagen with recent methods including VQ-GAN+CLIP, Latent Diffusion Models, and DALL-E 2, and find that human raters prefer Imagen over other models in side-by-side comparisons, both in terms of sample quality and image-text alignment.
Chitwan Saharia, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Remi Denton, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, Jonathan Ho, David J. Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi 0002
NeurIPS9
2021 Which Linguist Invented the Lightbulb? Presupposition Verification for Question-Answering
abstract
Najoung Kim, Ellie Pavlick, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Deepak Ramachandran. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Najoung Kim, Ellie Pavlick, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Deepak Ramachandran
ACL/IJCNLP (1)3
2021 Context-Based Quotation Recommendation
Ansel MacLaughlin, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Dan Roth 0001
ICWSM3
2006 Adaptive Transformation-Based Learning for Improving Dictionary Tagging
Burcu Karagol Ayan, David S. Doermann, Amy Weinberg
EACL1
2003 Acquisition of bilingual MT lexicons from OCRed dictionaries
abstract
This paper describes an approach to analyzing the lexical structure of OCRed bilingual dictionaries to construct resources suited for machine translation of low-density languages, where online resources are limited. A rule-based, an HMM-based, and a post-processed HMM-based method are used for rapid construction of MT lexicons based on systematic structural clues provided in the original dictionary. We evaluate the effectiveness of our techniques, concluding that: (1) the rule-based method performs better with dictionaries where the font is not an important distinguishing feature for determining information types; (2) the post-processed stochastic method improves the results of the stochastic method for phrasal entries; and (3) Our resulting bilingual lexicons are comprehensive enough to provide the basis for reasonable translation results when compared to human translations.
Burcu Karagol Ayan, David S. Doermann, Bonnie J. Dorr
MTSummit1