Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dmitry Pasechnyuk

dblp:242/6650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1208-1659ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 80% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 15% Automata and formal languages · 4%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods
0.912025
OPTAMI: Global Superlinear Convergence of High-order Methods · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.912025
OPTAMI: Global Superlinear Convergence of High-order Methods · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
high-order methods
0.912025
OPTAMI: Global Superlinear Convergence of High-order Methods · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods
0.912025
OPTAMI: Global Superlinear Convergence of High-order Methods · ICLR 2025
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › topology
algebraic topology
0.812024
Applying language models to algebraic topology: generating simplicial cycles using multi-labeling in Wu's formula · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method
0.612022
A Damped Newton Method Achieves Global $\mathcal O \left(\frac{1}{k^2}\right)$ and Local Quadratic Convergence Rate · NeurIPS 2022
Automata and formal languages › context-free languages
dyck language
0.212024
Applying language models to algebraic topology: generating simplicial cycles using multi-labeling in Wu's formula · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wu's formula · 1.5multi-labeling · 1.5language modeling · 1.5nesterov acceleration · 0.9cubic regularization · 0.9stepsize schedule · 0.6self-concordance · 0.6affine-invariant assumptions · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 OPTAMI: Global Superlinear Convergence of High-order Methods
abstract
Second-order methods for convex optimization outperform first-order methods in terms of theoretical iteration convergence, achieving rates up to $O(k^{-5})$ for highly-smooth functions. However, their practical performance and applications are limited due to their multi-level structure and implementation complexity. In this paper, we present new results on high-order optimization methods, supported by their practical performance. First, we show that the basic high-order methods, such as the Cubic Regularized Newton Method, exhibit global superlinear convergence for $\mu$-strongly star-convex functions, a class that includes $\mu$-strongly convex functions and some non-convex functions. Theoretical convergence results are both inspired and supported by the practical performance of these methods. Secondly, we propose a practical version of the Nesterov Accelerated Tensor method, called NATA. It significantly outperforms the classical variant and other high-order acceleration techniques in practice. The convergence of NATA is also supported by theoretical results. Finally, we introduce an open-source computational library for high-order methods, called OPTAMI. This library includes various methods, acceleration techniques, and subproblem solvers, all implemented as PyTorch optimizers, thereby facilitating the practical application of high-order methods to a wide range of optimization problems. We hope this library will simplify research and practical comparison of methods beyond first-order.
Dmitry Kamzolov, Artem Agafonov, Dmitry Pasechnyuk, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Martin Takác 0001
ICLR3
2024 Applying language models to algebraic topology: generating simplicial cycles using multi-labeling in Wu's formula
abstract
Computing homotopy groups of spheres has long been a fundamental objective in algebraic topology. Various theoretical and algorithmic approaches have been developed to tackle this problem. In this paper we take a step towards the goal of comprehending the group-theoretic structure of the generators of these homotopy groups by leveraging the power of machine learning. Specifically, in the simplicial group setting of Wu's formula, we reformulate the problem of generating simplicial cycles as a problem of sampling from the intersection of algorithmic datasets related to Dyck languages. We present and evaluate language modelling approaches that employ multi-label information for input sequences, along with the necessary group-theoretic toolkit and non-neural baselines.
Kirill Brilliantov, Fedor Pavutnitskiy, Dmitry Pasechnyuk, German Magai
ICML3
2022 A Damped Newton Method Achieves Global $\mathcal O \left(\frac{1}{k^2}\right)$ and Local Quadratic Convergence Rate
abstract
In this paper, we present the first stepsize schedule for Newton method resulting in fast global and local convergence guarantees. In particular, we a) prove an $\mathcal O \left( 1/{k^2} \right)$ global rate, which matches the state-of-the-art global rate of cubically regularized Newton method of Polyak and Nesterov (2006) and of regularized Newton method of Mishchenko (2021), and the later variant of Doikov and Nesterov (2021), b) prove a local quadratic rate, which matches the best-known local rate of second-order methods, and c) our stepsize formula is simple, explicit, and does not require solving any subproblem. Our convergence proofs hold under affine-invariant assumptions closely related to the notion of self-concordance. Finally, our method has competitive performance when compared to existing baselines which share the same fast global convergence guarantees.
Slavomír Hanzely, Dmitry Kamzolov, Dmitry Pasechnyuk, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Peter Richtárik, Martin Takác 0001
NeurIPS3