Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Udeepa Meepegama

dblp:242/7754 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 70% Speech recognition and synthesis · 15% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › automatic evaluation
learned evaluation metric
0.612022
Generative Pretraining for Paraphrase Evaluation · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation evaluation
paraphrase evaluation
0.612022
Generative Pretraining for Paraphrase Evaluation · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation
0.612022
Generative Pretraining for Paraphrase Evaluation · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.612022
Generative Pretraining for Paraphrase Evaluation · ACL (1) 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.512021
Learning de-identified representations of prosody from raw audio · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representation learning · 0.6generative pre-training · 0.6product quantization · 0.5minimum description length probing · 0.5contrastive self-supervised learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Generative Pretraining for Paraphrase Evaluation
abstract
We introduce ParaBLEU, a paraphrase representation learning model and evaluation metric for text generation.Unlike previous approaches, ParaBLEU learns to understand paraphrasis using generative conditioning as a pretraining objective.ParaBLEU correlates more strongly with human judgements than existing metrics, obtaining new state-of-the-art results on the 2017 WMT Metrics Shared Task.We show that our model is robust to data scarcity, exceeding previous state-of-the-art performance using only 50% of the available training data and surpassing BLEU, ROUGE and METEOR with only 40 labelled examples.Finally, we demonstrate that ParaBLEU can be used to conditionally generate novel paraphrases from a single demonstration, which we use to confirm our hypothesis that it learns abstract, generalized paraphrase representations.
Jack Weston, Raphael Lenain, Udeepa Meepegama, Emil Fristed
ACL (1)3
2021 Learning de-identified representations of prosody from raw audio
abstract
We propose a method for learning de-identified prosody representations from raw audio using a contrastive self-supervised signal. Whereas prior work has relied on conditioning models with bottlenecks, we introduce a set of inductive biases that exploit the natural structure of prosody to minimize timbral information and decouple prosody from speaker representations. Despite aggressive downsampling of the input and having no access to linguistic information, our model performs comparably to state-of-the-art speech representations on DAMMP, a new benchmark we introduce for spoken language understanding. We use minimum description length probing to show that our representations have selectively learned the subcomponents of non-timbral prosody, and that the product quantizer naturally disentangles them without using bottlenecks. We derive an information-theoretic definition of speech de-identifiability and use it to demonstrate that our prosody representations are less identifiable than the other speech representations.
Jack Weston, Raphael Lenain, Udeepa Meepegama, Emil Fristed
ICML3