Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Hillenbrand

dblp:243/2338 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1063-5734ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages
NoSQL database
0.412019
MigCast: Putting a Price Tag on Data Model Evolution in NoSQL Data Stores · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Data models and query languages › schema management
schema evolution
0.412019
MigCast: Putting a Price Tag on Data Model Evolution in NoSQL Data Stores · SIGMOD Conference 2019
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Automated Curation of Variational Data in NoSQL Databases through Metric-driven Self-adaptive Migration Strategies
Andrea Hillenbrand, Uta Störl
MODELSWARD1
2022 Self-adapting data migration in the context of schema evolution in NoSQL databases
abstract
Abstract When NoSQL database systems are used in an agile software development setting, data model changes occur frequently and thus, data is routinely stored in different versions. The management of versioned data leads to an overhead potentially impeding the software development. Several data migration strategies exist that handle legacy data differently during data accesses, each of which can be characterized by certain advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the requirements for the software application, we evaluate and compare different migration strategies through metrics like migration costs and latency as well as precision and recall. Ideally, exactly that strategy should be selected whose characteristics fulfill service-level agreements and match the migration scenario, which depends on the query workload and the changes in the data model which imply an evolution of the database schema. In this paper, we present a methodology of self-adapting data migration, which automatically adjusts migration strategies and their parameters with respect to the migration scenario and service-level agreements, thereby contributing to the self-management of database systems and supporting agile development.
Andrea Hillenbrand, Uta Störl, Shamil Nabiyev, Meike Klettke
Distributed Parallel Databases1
2021 Remaining in Control of the Impact of Schema Evolution in NoSQL Databases
Andrea Hillenbrand, Stefanie Scherzinger, Uta Störl
ER1
2021 Towards a Theory of Models in Systems Development Modeling
Andrea Hillenbrand
MODELSWARD1
2019 Query Rewriting for Continuously Evolving NoSQL Databases
Mark Lukas Möller, Meike Klettke, Andrea Hillenbrand, Uta Störl
ER3
2019 MigCast: Putting a Price Tag on Data Model Evolution in NoSQL Data Stores
abstract
We demonstrate MigCast, a tool-based advisor for exploring data migration strategies in the context of developing NoSQL-backed applications. Users of MigCast can consider their options for evolving their data model along with legacy data already persisted in the cloud-hosted production database. They can explore alternative actions as the financial costs are predicted respective to the cloud provider chosen. Thereby they are better equipped to assess potential consequences of imminent data migration decisions. To this end, MigCast maintains an internal cost model, taking into account characteristics of the data instance, expected workload, data model changes, and cloud provider pricing models. Hence, MigCast enables software project stakeholders to remain in control of the operative costs and to make informed decisions evolving their applications.
Andrea Hillenbrand, Maksym Levchenko, Uta Störl, Stefanie Scherzinger, Meike Klettke
SIGMOD Conference1