Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuqi Gu
dblp:243/3016
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4124-113XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Learning paradigms · 24% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Learning Attribute Patterns in High-Dimensional Structured Latent Attribute Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and Robustness · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and Robustness · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning
multi-task representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and Robustness · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
robust multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and Robustness · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixed membership models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Attribute Patterns in High-Dimensional Structured Latent Attribute Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation › maximum likelihood estimation
penalized likelihood |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Attribute Patterns in High-Dimensional Structured Latent Attribute Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thresholding · 0.9spectral methods · 0.9penalized empirical risk minimization · 0.9probability tensor decomposition · 0.7dirichlet distribution · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7selection consistency · 0.4penalized likelihood · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning from Similar Linear Representations: Adaptivity, Minimaxity, and RobustnessabstractRepresentation multi-task learning (MTL) has achieved tremendous success in practice. However, the theoretical understanding of these methods is still lacking. Most existing theoretical works focus on cases where all tasks share the same representation, and claim that MTL almost always improves performance. Nevertheless, as the number of tasks grows, assuming all tasks share the same representation is unrealistic. Furthermore, empirical findings often indicate that a shared representation does not necessarily improve single-task learning performance. In this paper, we aim to understand how to learn from tasks with similar but not exactly the same linear representations, while dealing with outlier tasks. Assuming a known intrinsic dimension, we propose a penalized empirical risk minimization method and a spectral method that are adaptive to the similarity structure and robust to outlier tasks. Both algorithms outperform single-task learning when representations across tasks are sufficiently similar and the proportion of outlier tasks is small. Moreover, they always perform at least as well as single-task learning, even when the representations are dissimilar. We provide information-theoretic lower bounds to demonstrate that both methods are nearly minimax optimal in a large regime, with the spectral method being optimal in the absence of outlier tasks. Additionally, we introduce a thresholding algorithm to adapt to an unknown intrinsic dimension. We conduct extensive numerical experiments to validate our theoretical findings. Yuqi Gu, Yang Feng 0002 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical DataabstractMixed Membership Models (MMMs) are a popular family of latent structure models for complex multivariate data. Instead of forcing each subject to belong to a single cluster, MMMs incorporate a vector of subject-specific weights characterizing partial membership across clusters. With this flexibility come challenges in uniquely identifying, estimating, and interpreting the parameters. In this article, we propose a new class of Dimension-Grouped MMMs (Gro-M$^3$s) for multivariate categorical data, which improve parsimony and interpretability. In Gro-M$^3$s, observed variables are partitioned into groups such that the latent membership is constant for variables within a group but can differ across groups. Traditional latent class models are obtained when all variables are in one group, while traditional MMMs are obtained when each variable is in its own group. The new model corresponds to a novel decomposition of probability tensors. Theoretically, we derive transparent identifiability conditions for both the unknown grouping structure and model parameters in general settings. Methodologically, we propose a Bayesian approach for Dirichlet Gro-M$^3$s to inferring the variable grouping structure and estimating model parameters. Simulation results demonstrate good computational performance and empirically confirm the identifiability results. We illustrate the new methodology through applications to a functional disability survey dataset and a personality test dataset. Yuqi Gu, Elena E. Erosheva, Gongjun Xu, David B. Dunson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning Attribute Patterns in High-Dimensional Structured Latent Attribute ModelsabstractStructured latent attribute models (SLAMs) are a special family of discrete latent variable models widely used in social and biological sciences. This paper considers the problem of learning significant attribute patterns from a SLAM with potentially high-dimensional configurations of the latent attributes. We address the theoretical identifiability issue, propose a penalized likelihood method for the selection of the attribute patterns, and further establish the selection consistency in such an overfitted SLAM with a diverging number of latent patterns. The good performance of the proposed methodology is illustrated by simulation studies and two real datasets in educational assessments. Yuqi Gu, Gongjun Xu |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |