Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Svyatoslav Gryaznov

dblp:243/3837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5648-8194ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
proof complexity
1.622026
The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications · STOC 2026
Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors · CCC 2022
Computational complexity
algebraic complexity
1.012026
Meta-Mathematics of Algebraic Complexity · LICS 2026
Computational complexity › proof complexity
algebraic proof systems
1.012026
The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications · STOC 2026
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit lower bounds
1.012026
The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications · STOC 2026
Computational complexity
lower bounds
1.012026
The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications · STOC 2026
Computational complexity › proof complexity › algebraic proof systems
polynomial calculus resolution
1.012026
The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications · STOC 2026
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
branching programs
0.612022
Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors · CCC 2022
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.612022
Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors · CCC 2022
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness › extractors
affine extractors
0.212022
Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors · CCC 2022
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
0.212022
Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors · CCC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sherali-adams · 1.0random restrictions · 1.0read-once branching programs · 0.6parity decision trees · 0.6directional affine extractor · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Meta-Mathematics of Algebraic Complexity
Michal Garlík, Svyatoslav Gryaznov, Jiaqi Lu 0007, Rahul Santhanam, Iddo Tzameret
LICS2
2026 The Weak Rank Principle: Lower Bounds and Applications
abstract
Given two symbolic matrices X and Y of dimensions m × n and n × m, respectively, the rank principle states that when m = n+1 and A is a scalar matrix of rank n+1, the equation XY = A is unsatisfiable. When m is arbitrarily larger than n and A has rank exceeding n, we obtain the weak rank principle. We study this principle as an algebraic generalisation of the weak pigeonhole principle (WPHP), asserting that m pigeons cannot be injected into n holes, extending its counting argument to an algebraic setting. As a strengthening of WPHP, it admits proof complexity lower bounds in settings where none are known for WPHP, yet we show that these still yield applications analogous to those of WPHP. In particular, using new generalised types of random restrictions, which may be interesting by themselves, this allows us to resolve a number of open problems in proof complexity, including the construction of proof complexity generators for Polynomial Calculus Resolution over the two-element field (PCRF2), new generators for Sherali–Adams (SA), and hardness results for circuit lower bound statements against PCRF2, as detailed below.
Michal Garlík, Svyatoslav Gryaznov, Hanlin Ren, Iddo Tzameret
STOC2
2022 Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors
abstract
A natural model of read-once linear branching programs is a branching program where queries are $\mathbb{F}_2$ linear forms, and along each path, the queries are linearly independent. We consider two restrictions of this model, which we call weakly and strongly read-once, both generalizing standard read-once branching programs and parity decision trees. Our main results are as follows. - Average-case complexity. We define a pseudo-random class of functions which we call directional affine extractors, and show that these functions are hard on average for the strongly read-once model. We then present an explicit construction of such function with good parameters. This strengthens the result of Cohen and Shinkar (ITCS'16) who gave such average-case hardness for parity decision trees. Directional affine extractors are stronger than the more familiar class of affine extractors. Given the significance of these functions, we expect that our new class of functions might be of independent interest. - Proof complexity. We also consider the proof system $\text{Res}[\oplus]$ which is an extension of resolution with linear queries. A refutation of a CNF in this proof system naturally defines a linear branching program solving the corresponding search problem. Conversely, we show that a weakly read-once linear BP solving the search problem can be converted to a $\text{Res}[\oplus]$ refutation with constant blow up.
Svyatoslav Gryaznov, Pavel Pudlák, Navid Talebanfard
CCC1
2022 A Variant of the VC-Dimension with Applications to Depth-3 Circuits
abstract
We introduce the following variant of the VC-dimension. Given S ⊆ {0,1}ⁿ and a positive integer d, we define 𝕌_d(S) to be the size of the largest subset I ⊆ [n] such that the projection of S on every subset of I of size d is the d-dimensional cube. We show that determining the largest cardinality of a set with a given 𝕌_d dimension is equivalent to a Turán-type problem related to the total number of cliques in a d-uniform hypergraph. This allows us to beat the Sauer-Shelah lemma for this notion of dimension. We use this to obtain several results on Σ₃^k-circuits, i.e., depth-3 circuits with top gate OR and bottom fan-in at most k: - Tight relationship between the number of satisfying assignments of a 2-CNF and the dimension of the largest projection accepted by it, thus improving Paturi, Saks, and Zane (Comput. Complex. '00). - Improved Σ₃³-circuit lower bounds for affine dispersers for sublinear dimension. Moreover, we pose a purely hypergraph-theoretic conjecture under which we get further improvement. - We make progress towards settling the Σ₃² complexity of the inner product function and all degree-2 polynomials over 𝔽₂ in general. The question of determining the Σ₃³ complexity of IP was recently posed by Golovnev, Kulikov, and Williams (ITCS'21).
Peter Frankl, Svyatoslav Gryaznov, Navid Talebanfard
ITCS2