Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cas Widdershoven

dblp:243/5879 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1676-0747ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 25% Computational complexity · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction
0.712023
Dimensionality Reduction for General KDE Mode Finding · ICML 2023
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation
0.712023
Dimensionality Reduction for General KDE Mode Finding · ICML 2023
Algorithms and data structures › kernel methods
kernel density estimation
0.712023
Dimensionality Reduction for General KDE Mode Finding · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization
mode finding
0.712023
Dimensionality Reduction for General KDE Mode Finding · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized dimensionality reduction · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ISS-Scenario: Scenario-Based Testing in CARLA
Renjue Li, Tianhang Qin, Cas Widdershoven
TASE3
2023 Dimensionality Reduction for General KDE Mode Finding
abstract
Finding the mode of a high dimensional probability distribution $\mathcal{D}$ is a fundamental algorithmic problem in statistics and data analysis. There has been particular interest in efficient methods for solving the problem when $\mathcal{D}$ is represented as a mixture model or kernel density estimate, although few algorithmic results with worst-case approximation and runtime guarantees are known. In this work, we significantly generalize a result of (LeeLiMusco:2021) on mode approximation for Gaussian mixture models. We develop randomized dimensionality reduction methods for mixtures involving a broader class of kernels, including the popular logistic, sigmoid, and generalized Gaussian kernels. As in Lee et al.'s work, our dimensionality reduction results yield quasi-polynomial algorithms for mode finding with multiplicative accuracy $(1-\epsilon)$ for any $\epsilon > 0$. Moreover, when combined with gradient descent, they yield efficient practical heuristics for the problem. In addition to our positive results, we prove a hardness result for box kernels, showing that there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding the mode of a kernel density estimate, unless $\mathit{P} = \mathit{NP}$. Obtaining similar hardness results for kernels used in practice (like Gaussian or logistic kernels) is an interesting future direction.
Xinyu Luo, Christopher Musco, Cas Widdershoven
ICML3
2021 Linear-Time Model Checking Branching Processes
abstract
(Multi-type) branching processes are a natural and well-studied model for generating random infinite trees. Branching processes feature both nondeterministic and probabilistic branching, generalizing both transition systems and Markov chains (but not generally Markov decision processes). We study the complexity of model checking branching processes against linear-time omega-regular specifications: is it the case almost surely that every branch of a tree randomly generated by the branching process satisfies the omega-regular specification? The main result is that for LTL specifications this problem is in PSPACE, subsuming classical results for transition systems and Markov chains, respectively. The underlying general model-checking algorithm is based on the automata-theoretic approach, using unambiguous Büchi automata.
Stefan Kiefer, Pavel Semukhin, Cas Widdershoven
CONCUR3
2019 Efficient Analysis of Unambiguous Automata Using Matrix Semigroup Techniques
abstract
We introduce a novel technique to analyse unambiguous Büchi automata quantitatively, and apply this to the model checking problem. It is based on linear-algebra arguments that originate from the analysis of matrix semigroups with constant spectral radius. This method can replace a combinatorial procedure that dominates the computational complexity of the existing procedure by Baier et al. We analyse the complexity in detail, showing that, in terms of the set $Q$ of states of the automaton, the new algorithm runs in time $O(|Q|^4)$, improving on an efficient implementation of the combinatorial algorithm by a factor of $|Q|$.
Stefan Kiefer, Cas Widdershoven
MFCS2