Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fatih Balli

dblp:243/8085 · also M. Fatih Balli, Muhammed Fatih Balli · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure messaging
ratcheting
0.412020
Determining the Core Primitive for Optimally Secure Ratcheting · ASIACRYPT (3) 2020
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure messaging
0.412020
Determining the Core Primitive for Optimally Secure Ratcheting · ASIACRYPT (3) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ratcheting · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Complete Practical Side-Channel-Assisted Reverse Engineering of AES-Like Ciphers
Andrea Caforio, Fatih Balli, Subhadeep Banik
CARDIS2
2021 A Deeper Look at the Energy Consumption of Lightweight Block Ciphers
abstract
In the last few years, the field of lightweight cryptography has seen an influx in the number of block ciphers and hash functions being proposed. In the past there have been numerous papers that have looked at circuit level implementation of block ciphers with respect to lightweight metrics like area power and energy. In the paper by Banik et al. (SAC‘15), for example, by studying the energy consumption model of a CMOS gate, it was shown that the energy consumed per cycle during the encryption operation of an r-round unrolled architecture of any block cipher is a quadratic function in r. However, most of these explorative works were at a gate level, in which a circuit synthesizer would construct a circuit using gates from a standard cell library, and the area power and energy would be estimated by estimating the switching statistics of the nodes in the circuit. Since only a part of the EDA design flow was done, it did not account for issues that might arise when the circuit is finally mapped into silicon post route. Metrics like area, power and energy would need to be re-estimated due to the effect of the parasitics introduced in the circuit by the connecting wires, nodes and interconnects. In this paper, we look to plug this very gap in literature by re-examining the designs of lightweight block ciphers with respect to their performances after completing the placement and routing process. This is a timely exercise to do since three of the block ciphers we analyze in the paper are used in around 13 of the 32 candidates in the second round of the NIST lightweight competition being conducted currently.
Andrea Caforio, Fatih Balli, Subhadeep Banik, Francesco Regazzoni 0001
DATE2
2020 Determining the Core Primitive for Optimally Secure Ratcheting
Fatih Balli, Paul Rösler, Serge Vaudenay
ASIACRYPT (3)1
2020 Energy Analysis of Lightweight AEAD Circuits
Andrea Caforio, Fatih Balli, Subhadeep Banik
CANS2