Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benedikt Wagner
dblp:244/9639
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
0as first author
25since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4620-7264ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 23 · 23 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
19 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 66% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 20% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 7% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 40, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
7.4 | 10 | 2025 | At the Top of the Hypercube - Better Size-Time Tradeoffs for Hash-Based Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
multi-signature |
3.0 | 4 | 2025 | T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024 Tightly Secure Non-interactive BLS Multi-signatures · ASIACRYPT (2) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
blind signatures |
2.0 | 3 | 2024 | Practical Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups · ASIACRYPT (1) 2024 Rai-Choo! Evolving Blind Signatures to the Next Level · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023 PI-Cut-Choo and Friends: Compact Blind Signatures via Parallel Instance Cut-and-Choose and More · CRYPTO (3) 2022 |
Distributed systems › consensus
byzantine broadcast |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Byzantine Consensus in the Partially Authenticated Setting · PODC 2026 Sublinear-Round Broadcast without Trusted Setup · SODA 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › multi-signature
two-round multi-signatures |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024 Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023 Tighter Security for Generic Authenticated Key Exchange in the QROM · ASIACRYPT (4) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
threshold cryptography |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation · CRYPTO (6) 2025 HARTS: High-Threshold, Adaptively Secure, and Robust Threshold Schnorr Signatures · ASIACRYPT (3) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
selective opening security |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
tight security |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes · J. Cryptol. 2026 |
Distributed systems › consensus
byzantine agreement |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Byzantine Consensus in the Partially Authenticated Setting · PODC 2026 |
Distributed systems
consensus |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Byzantine Consensus in the Partially Authenticated Setting · PODC 2026 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Byzantine Consensus in the Partially Authenticated Setting · PODC 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023 At the Top of the Hypercube - Better Size-Time Tradeoffs for Hash-Based Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › broadcast
byzantine broadcast |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sublinear-Round Broadcast without Trusted Setup · SODA 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
hash-based signatures |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | At the Top of the Hypercube - Better Size-Time Tradeoffs for Hash-Based Signatures · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
key aggregation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
anonymity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Holistic Security Analysis of Monero Transactions · EUROCRYPT (3) 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain interoperability
atomic swap |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sweep-UC: Swapping Coins Privately · SP 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
BLS signature |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tightly Secure Non-interactive BLS Multi-signatures · ASIACRYPT (2) 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › privacy-preserving blockchain
cryptocurrency privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Holistic Security Analysis of Monero Transactions · EUROCRYPT (3) 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › privacy-preserving blockchain
monero |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Holistic Security Analysis of Monero Transactions · EUROCRYPT (3) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › discrete logarithm signature
schnorr signatures |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | HARTS: High-Threshold, Adaptively Secure, and Robust Threshold Schnorr Signatures · ASIACRYPT (3) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › threshold signature
threshold schnorr signature |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Twinkle: Threshold Signatures from DDH with Full Adaptive Security · EUROCRYPT (1) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
threshold signature |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | HARTS: High-Threshold, Adaptively Secure, and Robust Threshold Schnorr Signatures · ASIACRYPT (3) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
universally composable security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sweep-UC: Swapping Coins Privately · SP 2024 |
Authentication and access control › passwordless authentication
FIDO2 |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Token meets Wallet: Formalizing Privacy and Revocation for FIDO2 · SP 2023 |
Authentication and access control › revocation
key revocation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Token meets Wallet: Formalizing Privacy and Revocation for FIDO2 · SP 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security · CRYPTO (5) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
public key infrastructure · 2.7uniform reference string · 1.7proof of stake · 1.0generic construction · 1.0two-round protocol · 0.9tight security proof · 0.9security proof · 0.8modular protocol design · 0.8DDH · 0.8reduction · 0.7formal security modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tight Lattice-Based Signatures Without Trapdoors from Search LWE
Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Nico Döttling, Julian Loss, Stefano Tessaro, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (3) | 5 |
| 2026 | Aborting Random Oracles: How to Build Them, How to Use Them
Gottfried Herold, Dmitry Khovratovich, Mikhail A. Kudinov, Stefano Tessaro, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (6) | 5 |
| 2026 | Byzantine Consensus in the Partially Authenticated SettingabstractByzantine Agreement and Broadcast are traditionally studied in one of two extremes: the authenticated setting, where a public key infrastructure (PKI) enables universally verifiable signatures and yields higher fault tolerance, and the unauthenticated setting, where no PKI is available and resilience necessarily drops. Motivated by Proof-of-Stake blockchains, where only a stable subset of participants (e.g., validators) have registered long-term keys while others do not, we initiate a systematic study of consensus in the partially authenticated setting, where a subset of parties are registered in a PKI and the remaining parties are unregistered. Christoph Lenzen 0001, Julian Loss, Kecheng Shi 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
PODC | 4 |
| 2026 | Generic Constructions of Compact and Tightly Selective-Opening Secure Public-Key Encryption Schemes
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng |
J. Cryptol. | 2 |
| 2025 | T-Spoon: Tightly Secure Two-Round Multi-signatures with Key Aggregation
Renas Bacho, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (6) | 2 |
| 2025 | At the Top of the Hypercube - Better Size-Time Tradeoffs for Hash-Based Signatures
Dmitry Khovratovich, Mikhail A. Kudinov, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (6) | 3 |
| 2025 | Kleptographic Attacks Against Implicit Rejection
Antoine Joux, Julian Loss, Benedikt Wagner |
PKC (4) | 3 |
| 2025 | Sublinear-Round Broadcast without Trusted SetupabstractByzantine broadcast is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing. Many of its practical applications, from multiparty computation to consensus mechanisms for blockchains, require increasingly weaker trust assumptions, as well as scalability for an ever-growing number of users n. This rules out existing solutions which run in a linear number of rounds in n or rely on trusted setup requirements. In this paper, we propose the first sublinear-round and trustless Byzantine broadcast protocol for the dishonest majority setting. Unlike previous sublinear-round protocols, our protocol assumes neither the existence of a trusted dealer who honestly issues keys and correlated random strings to the parties nor random oracles. Instead, we present a solution whose setup is limited to an unstructured uniform reference string and a plain public key infrastructure (a.k.a. bulletin-board PKI). Andreea B. Alexandru, Julian Loss, Charalampos Papamanthou, Giorgos Tsimos, Benedikt Wagner |
SODA | 5 |
| 2024 | HARTS: High-Threshold, Adaptively Secure, and Robust Threshold Schnorr Signatures
Renas Bacho, Julian Loss, Gilad Stern, Benedikt Wagner |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 4 |
| 2024 | Tightly Secure Non-interactive BLS Multi-signatures
Renas Bacho, Benedikt Wagner |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 2 |
| 2024 | Jackpot: Non-interactive Aggregatable Lotteries
Nils Fleischhacker, Mathias Hall-Andersen, Mark Simkin 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
ASIACRYPT (6) | 4 |
| 2024 | Practical Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups
Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle, Benedikt Wagner |
ASIACRYPT (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | FRIDA: Data Availability Sampling from FRI
Mathias Hall-Andersen, Mark Simkin 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (6) | 3 |
| 2024 | Twinkle: Threshold Signatures from DDH with Full Adaptive Security
Renas Bacho, Julian Loss, Stefano Tessaro, Benedikt Wagner, Chenzhi Zhu |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | A Holistic Security Analysis of Monero Transactions
Cas Cremers, Julian Loss, Benedikt Wagner |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 3 |
| 2024 | Toothpicks: More Efficient Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Sweep-UC: Swapping Coins PrivatelyabstractFair exchange (also referred to as atomic swap) is a fundamental operation in any cryptocurrency that allows users to atomically exchange coins. While a large body of work has been devoted to this problem, most solutions lack on-chain privacy. Thus, coins retain a public transaction history which is known to degrade the fungibility of a currency. This has led to a flourishing line of related research on fair exchange with privacy guarantees. Existing protocols either rely on heavy scripting (which also degrades fungibility and leads to high transaction fees), do not support atomic swaps across a wide range of currencies, or come with incomplete security proofs.To overcome these limitations, we introduce Sweep-UC1, the first fair exchange protocol that simultaneously is efficient, minimizes scripting, and is compatible with a wide range of currencies (more than the state of the art). We build SweepUC from modular sub-protocols and give a rigorous security analysis in the UC framework. Many of our tools and security definitions can be used in standalone fashion and may serve as useful components for future constructions of fair exchange. Lucjan Hanzlik, Julian Loss, Sri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Benedikt Wagner |
SP | 4 |
| 2024 | Generic constructions of master-key KDM secure attribute-based encryption
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Benedikt Wagner |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 3 |
| 2023 | Tighter Security for Generic Authenticated Key Exchange in the QROM
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng |
ASIACRYPT (4) | 2 |
| 2023 | Lattice-Based Authenticated Key Exchange with Tight Security
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner, Runzhi Zeng |
CRYPTO (5) | 2 |
| 2023 | Rai-Choo! Evolving Blind Signatures to the Next Level
Lucjan Hanzlik, Julian Loss, Benedikt Wagner |
EUROCRYPT (5) | 3 |
| 2023 | Chopsticks: Fork-Free Two-Round Multi-signatures from Non-interactive Assumptions
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
EUROCRYPT (5) | 2 |
| 2023 | Token meets Wallet: Formalizing Privacy and Revocation for FIDO2abstractThe FIDO2 standard is a widely-used class of challenge-response type protocols that allows to authenticate to an online service using a hardware token. Barbosa et al. (CRYPTO ‘21) provided the first formal security model and analysis for the FIDO2 standard. However, their model has two shortcomings: (1) It does not include privacy, one of the key features claimed by FIDO2. (2) It only covers tokens that store all secret keys locally. In contrast, due to limited memory, most existing FIDO2 tokens either derive all secret keys from a common seed or store keys on the server (the latter approach is also known as key wrapping).In this paper, we revisit the security of the WebAuthn component of FIDO2 as implemented in practice. Our contributions are as follows. (1) We adapt the model of Barbosa et al. so as to capture authentication tokens using key derivation or key wrapping. (2) We provide the first formal definition of privacy for the WebAuthn component of FIDO2. We then prove the privacy of this component in common FIDO2 token implementations if the underlying building blocks are chosen appropriately. (3) We address the unsolved problem of global key revocation in FIDO2. To this end, we introduce and analyze a simple revocation procedure that builds on the popular BIP32 standard used in cryptocurrency wallets and can efficiently be implemented with existing FIDO2 servers. Lucjan Hanzlik, Julian Loss, Benedikt Wagner |
SP | 3 |
| 2022 | PI-Cut-Choo and Friends: Compact Blind Signatures via Parallel Instance Cut-and-Choose and More
Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Lucjan Hanzlik, Julian Loss, Anna Lysyanskaya, Benedikt Wagner |
CRYPTO (3) | 5 |
| 2021 | Short Identity-Based Signatures with Tight Security from Lattices
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Benedikt Wagner |
PQCrypto | 2 |