Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yan-Ya Zhang
dblp:245/3302
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Program analysis · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
code clone detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Find Me if You Can: Deep Software Clone Detection by Exploiting the Contest between the Plagiarist and the Detector · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.8adversarial learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Find Me if You Can: Deep Software Clone Detection by Exploiting the Contest between the Plagiarist and the DetectorabstractCode clone is common in software development, which usually leads to software defects or copyright infringement. Researchers have paid significant attention to code clone detection, and many methods have been proposed. However, the patterns for generating the code clones do not always remain the same. In order to fool the clone detection systems, the plagiarists, known as the clone creator, usually conduct a series of tricky modifications on the code fragments to make the clone difficult to detect. The existing clone detection approaches, which neglects the dynamics of the “contest” between the plagiarist and the detectors, is doomed to be not robust to adversarial revision of the code. In this paper, we propose a novel clone detection approach, namely ACD, to mimic the adversarial process between the plagiarist and the detector, which enables us to not only build strong a clone detector but also model the behavior of the plagiarists. Such a plagiarist model may in turn help to understand the vulnerability of the current software clone detection tools. Experiments show that the learned policy of plagiarist can help us build stronger clone detector, which outperforms the existing clone detection methods. Yan-Ya Zhang, Ming Li 0005 |
AAAI | 1 |