Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiaoya Zhai

dblp:246/0161 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5209-8738ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 1 first-author · 9 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 85% Computational fabrication · 15%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
topology optimization
2.942024
Topology Optimization of Self-supporting Structures for Additive Manufacturing via Implicit B-spline Representations · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Multi-patch Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Density-Based Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
shape optimization
1.522024
Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Multi-patch Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Density-Based Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Computational fabrication › computational design
self-supporting structures
0.812024
Topology Optimization of Self-supporting Structures for Additive Manufacturing via Implicit B-spline Representations · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
isogeometric analysis
0.522024
Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Multi-patch Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Density-Based Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Geometric modeling and processing › solid modeling
shell structures
0.522024
Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Multi-patch Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Density-Based Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Shell Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2024
Computational fabrication
additive manufacturing
0.412019
Path Planning of a Type of Porous Structures for Additive Manufacturing · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Geometric modeling and processing
path planning
0.412019
Path Planning of a Type of Porous Structures for Additive Manufacturing · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Geometric modeling and processing › implicit surface
triply periodic minimal surfaces
0.212023
Topology Optimization of Self-supporting Porous Structures Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces · Comput. Aided Des. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topology optimization · 0.8implicit b-spline representation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Voxel-to-tet meshing for density-based topology optimization
Zenghao Xu, Xiaoya Zhai, Xiao-Ming Fu 0001
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.3
2025 Efficient worst-case topology optimization of self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing
Xiaoya Zhai, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.2
2025 Computational multi-layered wood carving art
Zhi Li 0076, Youcheng Cai, Xiaoya Zhai, Ketian Zhang, Ligang Liu 0001, Yi Min Xie, Xiao-Ming Fu 0001
Comput. Graph.5
2024 Density-Based Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Shell Structures
Qiong Pan, Xiaoya Zhai, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Des.2
2024 Isogeometric Topology Optimization of Multi-patch Shell Structures
Qiong Pan, Xiaoya Zhai, Hongmei Kang, Xiaoxiao Du 0002, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Des.2
2024 Topology Optimization of Self-supporting Structures for Additive Manufacturing via Implicit B-spline Representations
abstract
Owing to the rapid development in additive manufacturing , the potential to fabricate intricate structures has become a reality, emphasizing the importance of designing structures conducive to additive manufacturing processes . A crucial consideration is the ability to design structures requiring no additional support during manufacturing. This paper employs implicit B-spline representations for self-supporting structure design by integrating a topology optimization model with self-supporting constraints derived analytically from the implicit representation. This analytical derivation for detecting overhang regions enables accurate and efficient calculation of constraints, outperforming other B-spline-based methods. Compared to the traditional voxel-based methods, the implicit B-spline representation significantly expedites the optimization process by reducing the number of design variables. Additionally, several acceleration techniques are implemented to enhance the efficiency of our method, allowing simulations of 3D models with millions of finite elements to be completed within one and half an hour, excelling other B-spline-based methods and voxel-based methods. Various numerical experiments validate its excellent performance, confirming the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.
Xiaoya Zhai, Jingchao Jiang, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Des.2
2024 Differentiable microstructures design via anisotropic thermal diffusion
Qing Fang, Xiaoya Zhai, Ligang Liu 0001, Xiao-Ming Fu 0001
Comput. Graph.3
2023 Topology Optimization of Self-supporting Porous Structures Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces
Xiaoya Zhai, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Des.2
2022 Large-Scale Worst-Case Topology Optimization
abstract
Abstract We propose a novel topology optimization method to efficiently minimize the maximum compliance for a high‐resolution model bearing uncertain external loads. Central to this approach is a modified power method that can quickly compute the maximum eigenvalue to evaluate the worst‐case compliance, enabling our method to be suitable for large‐scale topology optimization. After obtaining the worst‐case compliance, we use the adjoint variable method to perform the sensitivity analysis for updating the density variables. By iteratively computing the worst‐case compliance, performing the sensitivity analysis, and updating the density variables, our algorithm achieves the optimized models with high efficiency. The capability and feasibility of our approach are demonstrated over various large‐scale models. Typically, for a model of size 512×170×170 and 69934 loading nodes, our method took about 50 minutes on a desktop computer with an NVIDIA GTX 1080Ti graphics card with 11 GB memory.
Di Zhang 0013, Xiaoya Zhai, Xiao-Ming Fu 0001, Heming Wang, Ligang Liu 0001
Comput. Graph. Forum2
2019 Path Planning of a Type of Porous Structures for Additive Manufacturing
Xiaoya Zhai, Falai Chen
Comput. Aided Des.1