Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emre Güler

dblp:248/1578 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Web and mobile security · 61% Systems and software security · 39%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
fuzzing
0.922024
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Web and mobile security
web security
0.812024
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Software testing › fuzzing
fuzzer benchmarking
0.712023
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
0.412019
AntiFuzz: Impeding Fuzzing Audits of Binary Executables · USENIX Security Symposium 2019
Software testing › fuzzing
web application fuzzing
0.212024
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Software testing
mutation testing
0.212023
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Systems and software security
binary analysis
0.112019
AntiFuzz: Impeding Fuzzing Audits of Binary Executables · USENIX Security Symposium 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutation analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities
Emre Güler, Sergej Schumilo, Moritz Schloegel, Nils Bars, Philipp Görz, Cemal Kaygusuz, Thorsten Holz
USENIX Security Symposium1
2023 Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis
Philipp Görz, Björn Mathis, Keno Hassler, Emre Güler, Thorsten Holz, Andreas Zeller, Rahul Gopinath
USENIX Security Symposium4
2020 Cupid : Automatic Fuzzer Selection for Collaborative Fuzzing
abstract
Combining the strengths of individual fuzzing methods is an appealing idea to find software faults more efficiently, especially when the computing budget is limited. In prior work, EnFuzz introduced the idea of ensemble fuzzing and devised three heuristics to classify properties of fuzzers in terms of diversity. Based on these heuristics, the authors manually picked a combination of different fuzzers that collaborate.
Emre Güler, Philipp Görz, Elia Geretto, Andrea Jemmett, Sebastian Österlund, Herbert Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida, Thorsten Holz
ACSAC1
2019 AntiFuzz: Impeding Fuzzing Audits of Binary Executables
Emre Güler, Cornelius Aschermann, Ali Abbasi 0002, Thorsten Holz
USENIX Security Symposium1