Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean Mercat

dblp:248/2886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Reinforcement learning · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction
1.022022
Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2022
Multi-Head Attention for Multi-Modal Joint Vehicle Motion Forecasting · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
downstream task performance prediction
0.912025
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › multimodal deep learning
multimodal model training
0.912025
Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
multimodal pretraining
0.912025
Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.912025
Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data? · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining
0.812024
DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation
0.812024
DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.712023
Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.712023
Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
online reinforcement learning
0.712023
Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
residual q-learning
0.712023
Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward learning
0.612022
Dynamics-Aware Comparison of Learned Reward Functions · ICLR 2022
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
multimodal trajectory prediction
0.412020
Multi-Head Attention for Multi-Modal Joint Vehicle Motion Forecasting · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
compute-optimal training
0.312025
Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing
0.212024
DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based filtering · 0.8deduplication · 0.8q-learning · 0.7markov decision process · 0.7importance weighting · 0.6dynamical systems analysis · 0.6attention model · 0.6multi-head attention · 0.4long short-term memory · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks
abstract
Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs, as they predict performance of large models using cheaper, small-scale experiments. However, there remain gaps between current scaling studies and how language models are ultimately trained and evaluated. For instance, scaling is usually studied in the compute-optimal training regime (i.e., "Chinchilla optimal" regime). In contrast, models are often over-trained to reduce inference costs. Moreover, scaling laws mostly predict loss on next-token prediction, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance. To address both shortcomings, we create a testbed of 104 models with 0.011B to 6.9B parameters trained with various numbers of tokens on three data distributions. First, we fit scaling laws that extrapolate in both the amount of over-training and the number of model parameters. This enables us to predict the validation loss of a 1.4B parameter, 900B token run (i.e., 32$\times$ over-trained) and a 6.9B parameter, 138B token run (i.e., a compute-optimal run)––each from experiments that take 300$\times$ less compute. Second, we relate the perplexity of a language model to its downstream task performance by proposing a power law. We use this law to predict top-1 error averaged over downstream tasks for the two aforementioned models, using experiments that take 20$\times$ less compute.
Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Rulin Shao, Jean Mercat, Alex Fang, Jeffrey Li, Sedrick Keh, Marianna Nezhurina, Igor Vasiljevic, Luca Soldaini, Jenia Jitsev, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Gabriel Ilharco, Pang Wei Koh, Shuran Song, Thomas Kollar
ICLR7
2025 Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data?
abstract
Pre-trained LLMs that are further trained with image data perform well on vision-language tasks. While adding images during a second training phase effectively unlocks this capability, it is unclear how much of a gain or loss this two-step pipeline gives over VLMs which integrate images earlier into the training process. To investigate this, we train models spanning various datasets, scales, image-text ratios, and amount of pre-training done before introducing vision tokens. We then fine-tune these models and evaluate their downstream performance on a suite of vision-language and text-only tasks. We find that pre-training with a mixture of image and text data allows models to perform better on vision-language tasks while maintaining strong performance on text-only evaluations. On an average of 6 diverse tasks, we find that for a 1B model, introducing visual tokens 80\% of the way through pre-training results in a 2\% average improvement over introducing visual tokens to a fully pre-trained model.
Sedrick Keh, Jean Mercat, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Kushal Arora, Igor Vasiljevic, Benjamin Burchfiel, Shuran Song, Russ Tedrake, Thomas Kollar, Ludwig Schmidt, Achal Dave
ICLR2
2024 Multi-Modal Representation Learning with Tactile Data
abstract
Advancements in embodied language models like PALM-E and RT-2 have significantly enhanced language-conditioned robotic manipulation. However, these advances remain predominantly focused on vision and language, often overlooking the pivotal role of tactile feedback which is advantageous in contact-rich interactions. Our research introduces a novel approach that synergizes tactile information with vision and language. We present the Multi-Modal Wand (MMWand) dataset enriched with linguistic descriptions and tactile data. By integrating tactile feedback, we aim to bridge the divide between human linguistic understanding and robotic sensory interpretation. Our multi-modal representation model is trained on these datasets by employing the multi-modal embedding alignment principle from ImageBind which has shown promising results, emphasizing the potential of tactile data in robotic applications. The validation of our approach in downstream robotics tasks, such as texture-based object classification, cross-modality retrieval, and the dense reward function for visuomotor control, attests to its effectiveness. Our contributions underscore the importance of tactile feedback in multi-modal robotic learning and its potential to enhance robotic tasks. The MMWand dataset is publicly available at https://hyung-gun.me/mmwand/.
Hyung-Gun Chi, Jose A. Barreiros, Jean Mercat, Karthik Ramani, Thomas Kollar
IROS3
2024 DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models
abstract
We introduce DataComp for Language Models, a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models.As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations.Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing atmodel scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters.As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set.The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 63% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2T training tokens.Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with half the compute.Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation. We release the \dclm benchmark, framework, models, and datasets at https://www.datacomp.ai/dclm/
Jeffrey Li, Alex Fang, Georgios Smyrnis, Maor Ivgi, Matt Jordan, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Hritik Bansal, Etash Kumar Guha, Sedrick Keh, Kushal Arora, Niklas Muennighoff, Reinhard Heckel, Jean Mercat, Mayee F. Chen, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Alon Albalak, Yonatan Bitton, Marianna Nezhurina, Amro Abbas, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Dhruba Ghosh, Josh Gardner 0001, Maciej Kilian, Hanlin Zhang 0002, Rulin Shao, Sarah M. Pratt, Sunny Sanyal, Gabriel Ilharco, Giannis Daras, Kalyani Marathe, Aaron Gokaslan, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Igor Vasiljevic, Sham M. Kakade, Shuran Song, Sujay Sanghavi, Fartash Faghri, Sewoong Oh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kyle Lo, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Hadi Pouransari, Alexander Toshev, Stephanie Wang, Dirk Groeneveld, Luca Soldaini, Pang Wei Koh, Jenia Jitsev, Thomas Kollar, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Ludwig Schmidt, Vaishaal Shankar
NeurIPS15
2023 Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value
abstract
Imitation Learning (IL) is a widely used framework for learning imitative behavior from demonstrations. It is especially appealing for solving complex real-world tasks where handcrafting reward function is difficult, or when the goal is to mimic human expert behavior. However, the learned imitative policy can only follow the behavior in the demonstration. When applying the imitative policy, we may need to customize the policy behavior to meet different requirements coming from diverse downstream tasks. Meanwhile, we still want the customized policy to maintain its imitative nature. To this end, we formulate a new problem setting called policy customization. It defines the learning task as training a policy that inherits the characteristics of the prior policy while satisfying some additional requirements imposed by a target downstream task. We propose a novel and principled approach to interpret and determine the trade-off between the two task objectives. Specifically, we formulate the customization problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a reward function that combines 1) the inherent reward of the demonstration; and 2) the add-on reward specified by the downstream task. We propose a novel framework, Residual Q-learning, which can solve the formulated MDP by leveraging the prior policy without knowing the inherent reward or value function of the prior policy. We derive a family of residual Q-learning algorithms that can realize offline and online policy customization, and show that the proposed algorithms can effectively accomplish policy customization tasks in various environments. Demo videos and code are available on our website: https://sites.google.com/view/residualq-learning.
Chenran Li, Chen Tang 0001, Haruki Nishimura, Jean Mercat, Masayoshi Tomizuka
NeurIPS4
2022 Dynamics-Aware Comparison of Learned Reward Functions
Blake Wulfe, Logan Ellis, Jean Mercat, Rowan McAllister, Adrien Gaidon
ICLR3
2022 Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Driving
abstract
Autonomous vehicle software is typically structured as a modular pipeline of individual components (e.g., perception, prediction, and planning) to help separate concerns into interpretable sub-tasks. Even when end-to-end training is possible, each module has its own set of objectives used for safety assurance, sample efficiency, regularization, or interpretability. However, intermediate objectives do not always align with overall system performance. For example, optimizing the likelihood of a trajectory prediction module might focus more on easy-to-predict agents than safety-critical or rare behaviors (e.g., jaywalking). In this paper, we present control-aware prediction objectives (CAPOs), to evaluate the down-stream effect of predictions on control without requiring the planner be differentiable. We propose two types of importance weights that weight the predictive likelihood: one using an attention model between agents, and another based on control variation when exchanging predicted trajectories for ground truth trajectories. Experimentally, we show our objectives improve overall system performance in suburban driving scenarios using the CARLA simulator.
Rowan McAllister, Blake Wulfe, Jean Mercat, Logan Ellis, Sergey Levine, Adrien Gaidon
ICRA3
2020 Multi-Head Attention for Multi-Modal Joint Vehicle Motion Forecasting
abstract
This paper presents a novel vehicle motion forecasting method based on multi-head attention. It produces joint forecasts for all vehicles on a road scene as sequences of multi-modal probability density functions of their positions. Its architecture uses multi-head attention to account for interactions between all vehicles, and long short-term memory layers for encoding and forecasting. It relies solely on vehicle position tracks, does not need maneuver definitions, and does not rasterize the scene as a spatial grid. This allows it to be more versatile than similar model while combining many forecasting capabilities, namely joint forecast with interactions, uncertainty estimation, and multi-modality. The resulting prediction likelihood outperforms state-of-the-art models on the same dataset.
Jean Mercat, Thomas Gilles, Nicole El Zoghby, Guillaume Sandou, Dominique Beauvois, Guillermo Pita Gil
ICRA1