Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Savvas Varsamopoulos
dblp:248/4445
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-5277-8768ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Comparing Neural Network Based Decoders for the Surface Code · IEEE Trans. Computers 2020 Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum error correction |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Comparing Neural Network Based Decoders for the Surface Code · IEEE Trans. Computers 2020 Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum error correction
surface code |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Comparing Neural Network Based Decoders for the Surface Code · IEEE Trans. Computers 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.9convolutional neural network · 0.9blossom algorithm · 0.9syndrome decoding · 0.3quantum error simulation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Comparing Neural Network Based Decoders for the Surface CodeabstractMatching algorithms can be used for identifying errors in quantum systems, being the most famous the Blossom algorithm. Recent works have shown that small distance quantum error correction codes can be efficiently decoded by employing machine learning techniques based on neural networks (NN). Various NN-based decoders have been proposed to enhance the decoding performance and the decoding time. Their implementation differs in how the decoding is performed, at logical or physical level, as well as in several neural network related parameters. In this work, we implement and compare two NN-based decoders, a low level decoder and a high level decoder, and study how different NN parameters affect their decoding performance and execution time. Crucial parameters such as the size of the training dataset, the structure and the type of the neural network, and the learning rate used during training are discussed. After performing this comparison, we conclude that the high level decoder based on a Recurrent NN shows a better balance between decoding performance and execution time and it is much easier to train. We then test its decoding performance for different code distances, probability datasets and under the depolarizing and circuit error models. Savvas Varsamopoulos, Koen Bertels, Carmen G. Almudéver |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 2019 | Quantum Accelerated Computer ArchitecturesabstractModern computer applications usually consist of a variety of components that often require quite different computational co-processors. Some examples of such co-processors are TPUs, GPUs or FPGAs. A more recent and promising technology that is being investigated is quantum co-processors. In this paper, we present a modern computer architecture where a quantum co-processor is included as an additional accelerator. In such an environment, the idea is to execute the application on a heterogeneous architecture where the classic processor will execute the host part, but certain components will be mapped, in our case, on the quantum accelerator. To this purpose, we define the distinct layers for the quantum computer architecture where there is a clear boundary between the host program and quantum kernel(s). We also discuss the opportunities and challenges of mapping hybrid algorithms to such a heterogeneous quantum computer architecture. Leon Riesebos, Xiang Fu 0003, A. A. Moueddenne, Lingling Lao, Savvas Varsamopoulos, Imran Ashraf 0002, Hans van Someren 0001, Nader Khammassi, Carmen G. Almudéver, Koen Bertels |
ISCAS | 5 |
| 2017 | Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer ArchitecturesabstractThe Pauli frame mechanism allows Pauli gates to be tracked in classical electronics and can relax the timing constraints for error syndrome measurement and error decoding. When building a quantum computer, such a mechanism may be beneficial, and the goal of this paper is not only to study the working principles of a Pauli frame but also to quantify its potential effect on the logical error rate. To this purpose, we implemented and simulated the Pauli frame module which, in principle, can be directly mapped into a hardware implementation. Simulation of a surface code 17 logical qubit has shown that a Pauli frame can reduce the error rate of a logical qubit up to 70% compared to the same logical qubit without Pauli frame when the decoding time equals the error correction time, and maximum parallelism can be obtained. Leon Riesebos, Xiang Fu 0003, Savvas Varsamopoulos, Carmen G. Almudéver, Koen Bertels |
DAC | 3 |
| 2017 | The engineering challenges in quantum computingabstractQuantum computers may revolutionize the field of computation by solving some complex problems that are intractable even for the most powerful current supercomputers. This paper first introduces the basic concepts of quantum computing and describes what the required layers are for building a quantum system. Thereafter, it discusses the different engineering challenges when building a quantum computer ranging from the core qubit technology, the control electronics, to the microarchitecture for the execution of quantum circuits and efficient quantum error correction. We conclude by discussing some compiler and programming issues relative to quantum algorithms. Carmen G. Almudéver, Lingling Lao, Xiang Fu 0003, Nader Khammassi, Imran Ashraf 0002, Dan Iorga, Savvas Varsamopoulos, Christopher Eichler, Andreas Wallraff, Lotte Geck, Andre Kruth, Joachim Knoch, Hendrik Bluhm, Koen Bertels |
DATE | 7 |