Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amith Manoharan

dblp:248/5657 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8454-0685ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Legged, aerial and field robots · 19% Multi-agent systems · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.412020
Strategies for Cooperative UAVs Using Model Predictive Control · IJCAI 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot systems
cooperative robots
0.112020
Strategies for Cooperative UAVs Using Model Predictive Control · IJCAI 2020
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle
0.112020
Strategies for Cooperative UAVs Using Model Predictive Control · IJCAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear model predictive control · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Bi-level Trajectory Optimization on Uneven Terrains with Differentiable Wheel-Terrain Interaction Model
abstract
Navigation of wheeled vehicles on uneven terrain necessitates going beyond the 2D approaches for trajectory planning. Specifically, it is essential to incorporate the full 6dof variation of vehicle pose and its associated stability cost in the planning process. To this end, most recent works aim to learn a neural network model to predict vehicle evolution. However, such approaches are data-intensive and fraught with generalization issues.In this paper, we present a purely model-based approach that just requires the digital elevation information of the terrain. Specifically, we express the wheel-terrain interaction and 6dof pose prediction as a non-linear least squares (NLS) problem. As a result, trajectory planning can be viewed as a bi-level optimization. The inner optimization layer predicts the pose on the terrain along a given trajectory, while the outer layer deforms the trajectory itself to reduce the stability and kinematic costs of the pose.We improve the state-of-the-art in the following respects. First, we show that our NLS-based pose prediction closely matches the output of a high-fidelity physics engine. This result, coupled with the fact that we can query gradients of the NLS solver, makes our pose predictor a differentiable wheel-terrain interaction model. We further leverage this differentiability to efficiently solve the proposed bi-level trajectory optimization problem. Finally, we perform extensive experiments and comparisons with a baseline to showcase the effectiveness of our approach in obtaining smooth, stable trajectories.
Amith Manoharan, Aditya Sharma 0001, Himani Belsare, Kaustab Pal, K. Madhava Krishna, Arun Kumar Singh 0001
IROS1
2024 Multi-AAV Cooperative Path Planning Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control With Localization Constraints
abstract
In this paper, we solve a joint cooperative localization and path planning problem for a group of Autonomous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) in GPS-denied areas using nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). A moving horizon estimator (MHE) is used to estimate the vehicle states with the help of relative bearing information to known landmarks and other vehicles. The goal of the NMPC is to devise optimal paths for each vehicle between a given source and destination while maintaining desired localization accuracy. Estimating localization covariance in the NMPC is computationally intensive; hence, we develop an approximate analytical closed-form expression based on the relationship between covariance and path lengths to landmarks. Using this expression while computing NMPC commands reduces the computational complexity significantly. We present numerical simulations to validate the proposed approach for different numbers of vehicles and landmark configurations. We also compare the results with EKF and RRT*based methods to show the superiority of the proposed closed-form approach.
Amith Manoharan, Rajnikant Sharma, P. B. Sujit
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.1
2020 Strategies for Cooperative UAVs Using Model Predictive Control
abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have reached significant maturity over several years for safe civilian operations like mapping, search and rescue. The operation performance can be significantly improved by deploying multiple cooperating UAVs and optimal decision making. In this work, we present the use of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for two different applications involving cooperative UAVs.
Amith Manoharan
IJCAI1