Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Madlen Kneile

dblp:248/8634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5219-0657ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Design research and methods · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 12% Immersive interaction · 11%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
more-than-human design
0.912025
Mediating Human-Nature Relations through Technology: A Scoping Review of Post-Anthropocentric Artifacts and Their Design Strategies · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025
Design research and methods › ideation method
design cards
0.812024
Virtual Unreality: Augmentation-Oriented Ideation Through Design Cards · CHI 2024
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
human-nature interaction
0.312025
Mediating Human-Nature Relations through Technology: A Scoping Review of Post-Anthropocentric Artifacts and Their Design Strategies · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025
Immersive interaction › virtual reality
virtual reality design
0.212024
Virtual Unreality: Augmentation-Oriented Ideation Through Design Cards · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scoping review · 0.9PRISMA-ScR · 0.9workshop study · 0.8interaction criticism · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mediating Human-Nature Relations through Technology: A Scoping Review of Post-Anthropocentric Artifacts and Their Design Strategies
abstract
The threatening environmental problems of our time challenge the notion that humans are separate from and dominant over nature. As a result, many studies in Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) address alternatives to human-centered design and explore post-anthropocentric approaches that decenter humans and consider nature in technology design. The question, however, is how to design post-anthropocentric technology that engages humans and nature. Based on the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a scoping review and analyzed 53 papers, from which we extracted 114 post-anthropocentric artifacts that enable human–nature engagement. We identified seven design strategies, such as recognizing, exploring, and empowering that can guide the future design of post-anthropocentric artifacts. Most of the artifacts included support human agency, fewer support nature’s agency, or advocate for nature to achieve an equitable human–nature relation. We identified opportunities for the field, such as empowering nature and further exploring the implications of post-anthropocentric design for addressing environmental problems.
Madlen Kneile, Judith Dörrenbächer, Marc Hassenzahl, Matthias Laschke
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.1
2024 Virtual Unreality: Augmentation-Oriented Ideation Through Design Cards
abstract
While realism is a common design goal for virtual reality (VR), VR also offers opportunities that are impossible in the real world (e.g., telekinesis). So far, there is no design support to exploit the potential of such “impossible” augmentations, especially for serious applications. We developed a card set and a workshop format, which features 15 opportunities to facilitate the ideation of augmentation-oriented VR. We piloted the method in five workshops with people in the early stages of developing a VR application (N=35). Participants found the cards easy to use and to inspire viable new concepts that differed from earlier ideas. Analysis of the concepts with interaction criticism identified two strategies: (1) augmentations that are only loosely related to the purpose of the application, simply to increase “fun”, and (2) augmentations that are closely related to the core purpose and thereby subtly facilitate its fulfillment. The latter has the greater potential.
Robin Neuhaus, Ronda Ringfort-Felner, Daniel Courtney, Madlen Kneile, Marc Hassenzahl
CHI4