Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Finn L. Strivens

dblp:248/9842 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › social interaction › interpersonal coordination
interpersonal synchrony
0.412019
Blink as you sync: uncovering eye and nod synchrony in conversation using wearable sensing · UbiComp 2019
Wearable and physiological sensing › wearable display
smart glasses
0.112019
Blink as you sync: uncovering eye and nod synchrony in conversation using wearable sensing · UbiComp 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inertial sensing · 0.4electrooculography · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Blink as you sync: uncovering eye and nod synchrony in conversation using wearable sensing
abstract
We tend to synchronize our movements to the person we are talking to during face-to-face conversation. Higher interpersonal synchrony is linked to greater empathy and more effortless interactions. This paper presents a first method and a corresponding dataset to explore synchrony in natural conversation by capturing eye and head movement using commodity smart eyewear. We present a 17 hour dataset, using Electrooculography and inertial sensing, of 42 people in conversation (21 dyads: 10 in Japanese, 10 in English, 1 in Chinese). Initial results on 18 dyads show significant interpersonal synchrony of blink and head nod behaviour during conversation (at frequencies of 0.2 to 0.5 Hz). We also find that people are more likely to synchronise blinks at around 1 Hz when conversing back-to-back than when face-to-face.
Finn L. Strivens, Benjamin Tag, Kai Kunze, Jamie A. Ward
UbiComp2