Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex Murphy
dblp:249/0878
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6155-0514ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 60% 3D vision · 40% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Brain · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Brain · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Brain · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
brain decoding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decoding Part-of-Speech from Human EEG Signals · ACL (1) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.7DBSCAN clustering · 1.7CLIP · 1.7pre-training · 1.1data augmentation · 1.1EEG decoding · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the BrainabstractPrior work has offered evidence for functional localization in the brain; different anatomical regions preferentially activate for certain types of visual input. For example, the fusiform face area preferentially activates for visual stimuli that include a face. However, the spectrum of visual semantics is extensive, and only a few semantically-tuned patches of cortex have so far been identified in the human brain. Using a multimodal (natural language and image) neural network architecture (CLIP, \cite{CLIP}, we train a highly accurate contrastive model that maps brain responses during naturalistic image viewing to CLIP embeddings. We then use a novel adaptation of the DBSCAN clustering algorithm to cluster the parameters of these participant-specific contrastive models. This reveals what we call Shared Decodable Concepts (SDCs): clusters in CLIP space that are decodable from common sets of voxels across multiple participants.
Examining the images most and least associated with each SDC cluster gives us additional insight into the semantic properties of each SDC. We note SDCs for previously reported visual features (e.g. orientation tuning in early visual cortex) as well as visual semantic concepts such as faces, places and bodies. In cases where our method finds multiple clusters for a visuo-semantic concept, the least associated images allow us to dissociate between confounding factors. For example, we discovered two clusters of food images, one driven by color, the other by shape. We also uncover previously unreported areas with visuo-semantic sensitivity such as regions of extrastriate body area (EBA) tuned for legs/hands and sensitivity to numerosity in right intraparietal sulcus, sensitivity associated with visual perspective (close/far) and more. Thus, our contrastive-learning methodology better characterizes new and existing visuo-semantic representations in the brain by leveraging multimodal neural network representations and a novel adaptation of clustering algorithms. Cory Efird, Alex Murphy, Joel Zylberberg, Alona Fyshe |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Exploring Temporal Sensitivity in the Brain Using Multi-timescale Language Models: An EEG Decoding StudyabstractAbstract The brain’s ability to perform complex computations at varying timescales is crucial, ranging from understanding single words to grasping the overarching narrative of a story. Recently, multi-timescale long short-term memory (MT-LSTM) models (Mahto et al. 2020; Jain et al. 2020) have been introduced, which use temporally tuned parameters to induce sensitivity to different timescales of language processing (i.e., related to near/distant words). However, there has not been an exploration of the relationship between such temporally tuned information processing in MT-LSTMs and the brain’s processing of language using high temporal resolution recording modalities, such as electroencephalography (EEG). To bridge this gap, we used an EEG dataset recorded while participants listened to Chapter 1 of “Alice in Wonderland” and trained ridge regression models to predict the temporally tuned MT-LSTM embeddings from EEG responses. Our analysis reveals that EEG signals can be used to predict MT-LSTM embeddings across various timescales. For longer timescales, our models produced accurate predictions within an extended time window of ±2 s around word onset, while for shorter timescales, significant predictions are confined to a narrower window ranging from −180 ms to 790 ms. Intriguingly, we observed that short timescale information is not only processed in the vicinity of word onset but also at more distant time points. These observations underscore the parallels and discrepancies between computational models and the neural mechanisms of the brain. As word embeddings are used more as in silico models of semantic representation in the brain, a more explicit consideration of timescale-dependent processing enables more targeted explorations of language processing in humans and machines. Sijie Ling, Alex Murphy, Alona Fyshe |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2022 | Decoding Part-of-Speech from Human EEG SignalsabstractThis work explores techniques to predict Part-of-Speech (PoS) tags from neural signals measured at millisecond resolution with electroencephalography (EEG) during text reading.We show that information about word length, frequency and word class is encoded by the brain at different poststimulus latencies.We then demonstrate that pretraining on averaged EEG data and data augmentation techniques boost PoS single-trial EEG decoding accuracy for Transformers (but not linear SVMs).Applying optimised temporally-resolved decoding techniques we show that Transformers outperform linear SVMs on PoS tagging of unigram and bigram data more strongly when information requires integration across longer time windows. Alex Murphy, Bernd Bohnet, Ryan T. McDonald, Uta Noppeney |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Examining Unequal Gender Distribution in Software Engineering
Alex Murphy, Ben Kelly, Kai Bergmann, Kyrylo Khaletskyy, Rory O'Connor, Paul M. Clarke |
EuroSPI | 1 |