Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias De Lange
dblp:249/2836
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2038-3275ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning paradigms · 65% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% Time series and sequential data · 7% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 81% Immersive interaction · 19% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
2.2 | 4 | 2023 | Continual evaluation for lifelong learning: Identifying the stability gap · ICLR 2023 A Continual Learning Survey: Defying Forgetting in Classification Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learning · ICCV 2021 |
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing
gesture recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Open-World Gesture Recognition · ISMAR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
stability-plasticity trade-off |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Continual Learning Survey: Defying Forgetting in Classification Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learning · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › non-stationary environments
concept drift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streams · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
online continual learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streams · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
prototype learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streams · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
rehearsal-based continual learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learning · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Unsupervised Model Personalization While Preserving Privacy and Scalability: An Open Problem · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated and distributed training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Unsupervised Model Personalization While Preserving Privacy and Scalability: An Open Problem · CVPR 2020 |
Interaction techniques and input
gesture input |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Open-World Gesture Recognition · ISMAR 2024 |
Immersive interaction
mixed reality interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Open-World Gesture Recognition · ISMAR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Continual evaluation for lifelong learning: Identifying the stability gap · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Continual Learning Survey: Defying Forgetting in Classification Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learning · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Unsupervised Model Personalization While Preserving Privacy and Scalability: An Open Problem · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving personalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Unsupervised Model Personalization While Preserving Privacy and Scalability: An Open Problem · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
continual learning · 0.8continual evaluation · 0.7weight decay · 0.6regularization · 0.6dropout · 0.6prototype learning · 0.5memory replay · 0.5empirical study · 0.5contrastive objective · 0.5benchmark evaluation · 0.5batch normalization adaptation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Open-World Gesture RecognitionabstractProviding users with accurate gestural interfaces, such as gesture recognition based on wrist-worn devices, is a key challenge in mixed reality. However, static machine learning processes in gesture recognition assume that training and test data come from the same underlying distribution. Unfortunately, in real-world applications involving gesture recognition, such as gesture recognition based on wrist-worn devices, the data distribution may change over time. We formulate this problem of adapting recognition models to new tasks, where new data patterns emerge, as open-world gesture recognition (OWGR). We propose the use of continual learning to enable machine learning models to be adaptive to new tasks without degrading performance on previously learned tasks. However, the process of exploring parameters for questions around when, and how, to train and deploy recognition models requires resource-intensive user studies may be impractical. To address this challenge, we propose a design engineering approach that enables offline analysis on a collected large-scale dataset by systematically examining various parameters and comparing different continual learning methods. Finally, we provide design guidelines to enhance the development of an open-world wrist-worn gesture recognition process. Junxiao Shen, Matthias De Lange, Xuhai Xu, Enmin Zhou, Ran Tan, Naveen Suda, Maciej Lazarewicz, Per Ola Kristensson, Amy Karlson, Evan Strasnick |
ISMAR | 2 |
| 2023 | Continual evaluation for lifelong learning: Identifying the stability gap
Matthias De Lange, Gido M. van de Ven, Tinne Tuytelaars |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | CLAD: A realistic Continual Learning benchmark for Autonomous Driving
Eli Verwimp, Sarah Parisot, Lanqing Hong, Steven McDonagh 0001, Eduardo Pérez-Pellitero, Matthias De Lange, Tinne Tuytelaars |
Neural Networks | 7 |
| 2022 | Re-examining Distillation for Continual Object Detection
Eli Verwimp, Sarah Parisot, Lanqing Hong, Steven McDonagh 0001, Eduardo Pérez-Pellitero, Matthias De Lange, Tinne Tuytelaars |
BMVC | 7 |
| 2022 | A Continual Learning Survey: Defying Forgetting in Classification TasksabstractArtificial neural networks thrive in solving the classification problem for a particular rigid task, acquiring knowledge through generalized learning behaviour from a distinct training phase. The resulting network resembles a static entity of knowledge, with endeavours to extend this knowledge without targeting the original task resulting in a catastrophic forgetting. Continual learning shifts this paradigm towards networks that can continually accumulate knowledge over different tasks without the need to retrain from scratch. We focus on task incremental classification, where tasks arrive sequentially and are delineated by clear boundaries. Our main contributions concern: (1) a taxonomy and extensive overview of the state-of-the-art; (2) a novel framework to continually determine the stability-plasticity trade-off of the continual learner; (3) a comprehensive experimental comparison of 11 state-of-the-art continual learning methods; and (4) baselines. We empirically scrutinize method strengths and weaknesses on three benchmarks, considering Tiny Imagenet and large-scale unbalanced iNaturalist and a sequence of recognition datasets. We study the influence of model capacity, weight decay and dropout regularization, and the order in which the tasks are presented, and qualitatively compare methods in terms of required memory, computation time, and storage. Matthias De Lange, Rahaf Aljundi, Marc Masana, Sarah Parisot, Xu Jia 0012, Ales Leonardis, Gregory Slabaugh, Tinne Tuytelaars |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data StreamsabstractAttaining prototypical features to represent class distributions is well established in representation learning. However, learning prototypes online from streaming data proves a challenging endeavor as they rapidly become outdated, caused by an ever-changing parameter space during the learning process. Additionally, continual learning does not assume the data stream to be stationary, typically resulting in catastrophic forgetting of previous knowledge. As a first, we introduce a system addressing both problems, where prototypes evolve continually in a shared latent space, enabling learning and prediction at any point in time. To facilitate learning, a novel objective function synchronizes the latent space with the continually evolving prototypes. In contrast to the major body of work in continual learning, data streams are processed in an online fashion without task information and can be highly imbalanced, for which we propose an efficient memory scheme. As an additional contribution, we propose the learner-evaluator framework that i) generalizes existing paradigms in continual learning, ii) introduces data incremental learning, and iii) models the bridge between continual learning and concept drift. We obtain state-of-the-art performance by a significant margin on eight benchmarks, including three highly imbalanced data streams. Code is publicly available.1 Matthias De Lange, Tinne Tuytelaars |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learningabstractLearning from non-stationary data streams and overcoming catastrophic forgetting still poses a serious challenge for machine learning research. Rather than aiming to improve state-of-the-art, in this work we provide insight into the limits and merits of rehearsal, one of continual learning’s most established methods. We hypothesize that models trained sequentially with rehearsal tend to stay in the same low-loss region after a task has finished, but are at risk of overfitting on its sample memory, hence harming generalization. We provide both conceptual and strong empirical evidence on three benchmarks for both behaviors, bringing novel insights into the dynamics of rehearsal and continual learning in general. Finally, we interpret important continual learning works in the light of our findings, allowing for a deeper understanding of their successes.1 Eli Verwimp, Matthias De Lange, Tinne Tuytelaars |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2020 | Unsupervised Model Personalization While Preserving Privacy and Scalability: An Open ProblemabstractThis work investigates the task of unsupervised model personalization, adapted to continually evolving, unlabeled local user images. We consider the practical scenario where a high capacity server interacts with a myriad of resource-limited edge devices, imposing strong requirements on scalability and local data privacy. We aim to address this challenge within the continual learning paradigm and provide a novel Dual User-Adaptation framework (DUA) to explore the problem. This framework flexibly disentangles user-adaptation into model personalization on the server and local data regularization on the user device, with desirable properties regarding scalability and privacy constraints. First, on the server, we introduce incremental learning of task-specific expert models, subsequently aggregated using a concealed unsupervised user prior. Aggregation avoids retraining, whereas the user prior conceals sensitive raw user data, and grants unsupervised adaptation. Second, local user-adaptation incorporates a domain adaptation point of view, adapting regularizing batch normalization parameters to the user data. We explore various empirical user configurations with different priors in categories and a tenfold of transforms for MIT Indoor Scene recognition, and classify numbers in a combined MNIST and SVHN setup. Extensive experiments yield promising results for data-driven local adaptation and elicit user priors for server adaptation to depend on the model rather than user data. Hence, although user-adaptation remains a challenging open problem, the DUA framework formalizes a principled foundation for personalizing both on server and user device, while maintaining privacy and scalability. Matthias De Lange, Xu Jia 0012, Sarah Parisot, Ales Leonardis, Gregory Slabaugh, Tinne Tuytelaars |
CVPR | 1 |