Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raunak Kumar
dblp:249/9236
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Reinforcement learning · 35% Learning theory · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 87% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 8% Mathematical optimization · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
auction theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives · EC 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › auction games
repeated auctions |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives · EC 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
temporal preferences |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives · EC 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Convex Optimization with Unbounded Memory · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Convex Optimization with Unbounded Memory · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks Problem · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandits with knapsacks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks Problem · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization convergence |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
exponential family |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
logarithmic regret |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks Problem · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks Problem · NeurIPS 2022 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Retrieving Top Weighted Triangles in Graphs · WSDM 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
ad auction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives · EC 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks Problem · NeurIPS 2022 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Retrieving Top Weighted Triangles in Graphs · WSDM 2020 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
subgraph counting |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Retrieving Top Weighted Triangles in Graphs · WSDM 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov decision process · 1.1linear programming · 1.1online learning · 0.9random sampling · 0.9deterministic sampling · 0.9mirror descent · 0.6bregman divergence · 0.6KL divergence · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing ObjectivesabstractIn this paper, we introduce a novel approach to repeated auctions that accounts for bidders' temporal preferences, important in applications such as advertising. In our model, when a player wins an auction after not winning for ℓ rounds, she is awarded r(ℓ) utility and her goal is to maximize her total utility. r : ℕ → ℝ ≥0 satisfies the following properties. (i) The more rounds without a win, the higher the reward, i.e., r is weakly increasing. (ii) As more rounds pass without winning, the increase in reward becomes smaller, i.e., r is concave. The motivation behind these properties comes from the advertising literature, which states that an increased frequency of winning builds advertising effectiveness at a decreasing (but not declining) rate. The above properties guarantee that adding more wins to any sequence of winning intervals increases the total reward. Giannis Fikioris, Robert D. Kleinberg, Yoav Kolumbus, Raunak Kumar, Yishay Mansour, Éva Tardos |
EC | 4 |
| 2023 | Online Convex Optimization with Unbounded MemoryabstractOnline convex optimization (OCO) is a widely used framework in online
learning. In each round, the learner chooses a decision in a convex set and an
adversary chooses a convex loss function, and then the learner suffers the
loss associated with their current decision. However, in many applications the
learner's loss depends not only on the current decision but on the entire
history of decisions until that point. The OCO framework and its existing
generalizations do not capture this, and they can only be applied to many
settings of interest after a long series of approximation arguments. They also
leave open the question of whether the dependence on memory is tight because
there are no non-trivial lower bounds. In this work we introduce a
generalization of the OCO framework, ``Online Convex Optimization with
Unbounded Memory'', that captures long-term dependence on past decisions. We
introduce the notion of $p$-effective memory capacity, $H_p$, that quantifies
the maximum influence of past decisions on present losses. We prove an
$O(\sqrt{H_p T})$ upper bound on the policy regret and a matching (worst-case)
lower bound. As a special case, we prove the first non-trivial lower bound for
OCO with finite memory~\citep{anavaHM2015online}, which could be of
independent interest, and also improve existing upper bounds. We demonstrate
the broad applicability of our framework by using it to derive regret bounds,
and to improve and simplify existing regret bound derivations, for a variety
of online learning problems including online linear control and an online
variant of performative prediction. Raunak Kumar, Sarah Dean, Robert D. Kleinberg |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror Descent (Extended Abstract)abstractExpectation maximization (EM) is the default algorithm for fitting probabilistic models with missing or latent variables, yet we lack a full understanding of its non-asymptotic convergence properties. Previous works show results along the lines of “EM converges at least as fast as gradient descent” by assuming the conditions for the convergence of gradient descent apply. This approach is not only loose, in that it does not capture that EM can make more progress than a gradient step, but the assumptions fail to hold for textbook examples of EM like Gaussian mixtures. In this work, we show that for the common setting of exponential family distributions, viewing EM as a mirror descent algorithm leads to convergence rates in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and how the KL divergence is related to first-order stationarity via Bregman divergences. In contrast to previous works, the analysis is invariant to the choice of parametrization and holds with minimal assumptions. We also show applications of these ideas to local linear (and superlinear) convergence rates, generalized EM, and non-exponential family distributions. Frederik Kunstner, Raunak Kumar, Mark Schmidt 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks ProblemabstractBandits with knapsacks (BwK) is an influential model of sequential decision-making under uncertainty that incorporates resource consumption constraints. In each round, the decision-maker observes an outcome consisting of a reward and a vector of nonnegative resource consumptions, and the budget of each resource is decremented by its consumption. In this paper we introduce a natural generalization of the stochastic BwK problem that allows non-monotonic resource utilization. In each round, the decision-maker observes an outcome consisting of a reward and a vector of resource drifts that can be positive, negative or zero, and the budget of each resource is incremented by its drift. Our main result is a Markov decision process (MDP) policy that has constant regret against a linear programming (LP) relaxation when the decision-maker knows the true outcome distributions. We build upon this to develop a learning algorithm that has logarithmic regret against the same LP relaxation when the decision-maker does not know the true outcome distributions. We also present a reduction from BwK to our model that shows our regret bound matches existing results. Raunak Kumar, Robert D. Kleinberg |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Homeomorphic-Invariance of EM: Non-Asymptotic Convergence in KL Divergence for Exponential Families via Mirror DescentabstractExpectation maximization (EM) is the default algorithm for fitting probabilistic models with missing or latent variables, yet we lack a full understanding of its non-asymptotic convergence properties. Previous works show results along the lines of "EM converges at least as fast as gradient descent" by assuming the conditions for the convergence of gradient descent apply to EM. This approach is not only loose, in that it does not capture that EM can make more progress than a gradient step, but the assumptions fail to hold for textbook examples of EM like Gaussian mixtures. In this work we first show that for the common setting of exponential family distributions, viewing EM as a mirror descent algorithm leads to convergence rates in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Then, we show how the KL divergence is related to first-order stationarity via Bregman divergences. In contrast to previous works, the analysis is invariant to the choice of parametrization and holds with minimal assumptions. We also show applications of these ideas to local linear (and superlinear) convergence rates, generalized EM, and non-exponential family distributions. Frederik Kunstner, Raunak Kumar, Mark Schmidt 0001 |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Retrieving Top Weighted Triangles in GraphsabstractPattern counting in graphs is a fundamental primitive for many network analysis tasks, and there are several methods for scaling subgraph counting to large graphs. Many real-world networks have a notion of strength of connection between nodes, which is often modeled by a weighted graph, but existing scalable algorithms for pattern mining are designed for unweighted graphs. Here, we develop deterministic and random sampling algorithms that enable the fast discovery of the 3-cliques (triangles) of largest weight, as measured by the generalized mean of the triangle's edge weights. For example, one of our proposed algorithms can find the top-1000 weighted triangles of a weighted graph with billions of edges in thirty seconds on a commodity server, which is orders of magnitude faster than existing "fast" enumeration schemes. Our methods open the door towards scalable pattern mining in weighted graphs. Raunak Kumar, Paul Liu 0001, Moses Charikar, Austin R. Benson |
WSDM | 1 |