Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorenzo Gagliardini

dblp:25/11214 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 27% Computational complexity · 23%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parallel manipulator
cable-driven parallel robot
0.422015
A reconfiguration strategy for Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots · ICRA 2015
Optimal design of cable-driven parallel robots for large industrial structures · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › parallel mechanism design
configuration selection
0.212015
A reconfiguration strategy for Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
design optimization
0.212014
Optimal design of cable-driven parallel robots for large industrial structures · ICRA 2014
Graph algorithms and graph theory › shortest path › single-source shortest paths
dijkstra's algorithm
0.112015
A reconfiguration strategy for Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots · ICRA 2015
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.112015
A reconfiguration strategy for Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots · ICRA 2015
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.112014
Optimal design of cable-driven parallel robots for large industrial structures · ICRA 2014
Mathematical optimization
design optimization
0.112014
Optimal design of cable-driven parallel robots for large industrial structures · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.8dijkstra's algorithm · 0.4constraint satisfaction · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A reconfiguration strategy for Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots
abstract
This paper deals with Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Robots (RCDPRs). A RCDPR is able to change the locations of its cable exit points, the latter being defined as the connection points between the cables and the robot base frame. Given a RCDPR, a set of possible reconfigurations, a desired platform path and a description of the robot environment, the reconfiguration strategy proposed in this paper selects the optimal configurations to be associated to each point of the desired path. The selection of the optimal configurations can be performed with respect to several criteria such as the number of configuration changes, the number of cable reconfigurations and the robot stiffness. In this paper, the optimization is performed using a Dijkstra's based algorithm.
Lorenzo Gagliardini, Stéphane Caro, Marc Gouttefarde, Alexis Girin
ICRA1
2014 Optimal design of cable-driven parallel robots for large industrial structures
abstract
This paper presents the preliminary studies dedicated to the design of cable-driven parallel robots (CDPRs) for industrial purposes. The goal is to transport the proper tools around a jacket, an offshore structure supporting a wind turbine, in order to perform painting and sandblasting tasks. In this paper, a simplified case study consisting of a structure composed of four tubes is investigated. A fully constrained CDPR and a suspended CDPR are studied. The design problems of the CDPRs at hand are formulated as optimization problems. They aim at determining the locations of the base anchor points of the cables that minimize the size of the CDPR, while satisfying a set of constraints. Those constraints guarantee that the moving platform can support the external wrenches and that there is no interference between the cables and between the cables and the environment, all along the path to be followed by the moving platform.
Lorenzo Gagliardini, Stéphane Caro, Marc Gouttefarde, Philippe Wenger, Alexis Girin
ICRA1
2011 A Support Vector Machines network for traffic sign recognition
abstract
The objective of this paper is to describe an algorithm able to solve the traffic sign recognition problem, based on a structure composed by a cascade of competing classifiers and some computer vision pre-processing operations. Traffic sign recognition is a very complex problem, involving a multiclass analysis with unbalanced class frequencies, most of them very similar to each other. With our system, that we are going to call Traffic Sign Classifier (TSC), during the competition promoted by the Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr Universität Bochum, it was possible to recognize more than 40 classes of signs with an average error close to 3%. The algorithm, realized by our development team, consists basically of two modules: a preprocessing module, where the data are managed in order to extract some features, such as the Hue Histogram (HH) and the Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG); a second module, where the data coming from the first one are analyzed using a sequence of Support Vector Machines (SVM), implemented with the One Versus All (OVA) methodology. This module includes a couple of systems, composed of several SVMs; one of these systems consists of a hierarchical structure. The results coming out from both the systems are compared with each other in order to define which is the most reliable. This work is performed by the so called “Combining the Results and Assigning the Labels” procedure; calibrating the systems and the parameters employed inside the several analyses performed, it is possible to decrease the number of misclassifications and consequently increase the performance of the entire network.
Fabio Boi, Lorenzo Gagliardini
IJCNN2