Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergey B. Stepaniants

dblp:25/82 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
error model
0.112006
Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
microarray gene expression analysis
0.112006
Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012003
Microarray Standard Data Set and Figures of Merit for Comparing Data Processing Methods and Experiment Designs · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012003
Microarray Standard Data Set and Figures of Merit for Comparing Data Processing Methods and Experiment Designs · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012003
Microarray Standard Data Set and Figures of Merit for Comparing Data Processing Methods and Experiment Designs · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance stabilization · 0.1error model · 0.1statistical analysis · 0.0normalization · 0.0image processing · 0.0error modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis
abstract
Abstract Motivation: In microarray gene expression studies, the number of replicated microarrays is usually small because of cost and sample availability, resulting in unreliable variance estimation and thus unreliable statistical hypothesis tests. The unreliable variance estimation is further complicated by the fact that the technology-specific variance is intrinsically intensity-dependent. Results: The Rosetta error model captures the variance-intensity relationship for various types of microarray technologies, such as single-color arrays and two-color arrays. This error model conservatively estimates intensity error and uses this value to stabilize the variance estimation. We present two commonly used error models: the intensity error-model for single-color microarrays and the ratio error model for two-color microarrays or ratios built from two single-color arrays. We present examples to demonstrate the strength of our error models in improving statistical power of microarray data analysis, particularly, in increasing expression detection sensitivity and specificity when the number of replicates is limited. Availability: Rosetta error models are available in the Rosetta Resolver® system for gene expression analysis. These technology-specific error models are designed and optimized for different microarray technologies, such as Affymetrix® and Agilent Technologies. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data and Appendices are available at Bioinformatics online.
Lee Weng, Hongyue Dai, Yihui Zhan, Yudong D. He, Sergey B. Stepaniants, Douglas E. Bassett
Bioinform.5
2003 Microarray Standard Data Set and Figures of Merit for Comparing Data Processing Methods and Experiment Designs
abstract
MOTIVATION: There is a very large and growing level of effort toward improving the platforms, experiment designs, and data analysis methods for microarray expression profiling. Along with a growing richness in the approaches there is a growing confusion among most scientists as to how to make objective comparisons and choices between them for different applications. There is a need for a standard framework for the microarray community to compare and improve analytical and statistical methods. RESULTS: We report on a microarray data set comprising 204 in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays, each hybridized with two-color cDNA samples derived from 20 different human tissues and cell lines. Design of the approximately 24 000 60mer oligonucleotides that report approximately 2500 known genes on the arrays, and design of the hybridization experiments, were carried out in a way that supports the performance assessment of alternative data processing approaches and of alternative experiment and array designs. We also propose standard figures of merit for success in detecting individual differential expression changes or expression levels, and for detecting similarities and differences in expression patterns across genes and experiments. We expect this data set and the proposed figures of merit will provide a standard framework for much of the microarray community to compare and improve many analytical and statistical methods relevant to microarray data analysis, including image processing, normalization, error modeling, combining of multiple reporters per gene, use of replicate experiments, and sample referencing schemes in measurements based on expression change. AVAILABILITY/SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Expression data and supplementary information are available at http://www.rii.com/publications/2003/HE_SDS.htm
Yudong D. He, Hongyue Dai, Eric E. Schadt, Guy Cavet, Stephen W. Edwards, Sergey B. Stepaniants, Sven Duenwald, Robert Kleinhanz, Allan R. Jones, Daniel D. Shoemaker, Roland B. Stoughton
Bioinform.6