Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Sadeghi

dblp:250/2788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4106-2374ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 71% Image recognition and object detection · 29%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.922024
Query-Based Hard-Image Retrieval for Object Detection at Test Time · AAAI 2023
On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines · ECCV (21) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
object detection calibration
0.812024
On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines · ECCV (21) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration
0.812024
On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines · ECCV (21) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › model debugging
failure mode analysis
0.712023
Query-Based Hard-Image Retrieval for Object Detection at Test Time · AAAI 2023
Information retrieval
query-based retrieval
0.712023
Query-Based Hard-Image Retrieval for Object Detection at Test Time · AAAI 2023
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.712023
Query-Based Hard-Image Retrieval for Object Detection at Test Time · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic modeling · 1.3monte carlo estimation · 1.3reliability diagrams · 0.8calibration evaluation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines
Selim Kuzucu, Kemal Oksuz, Jonathan Sadeghi, Puneet K. Dokania
ECCV (21)3
2023 Query-Based Hard-Image Retrieval for Object Detection at Test Time
abstract
There is a longstanding interest in capturing the error behaviour of object detectors by finding images where their performance is likely to be unsatisfactory. In real-world applications such as autonomous driving, it is also crucial to characterise potential failures beyond simple requirements of detection performance. For example, a missed detection of a pedestrian close to an ego vehicle will generally require closer inspection than a missed detection of a car in the distance. The problem of predicting such potential failures at test time has largely been overlooked in the literature and conventional approaches based on detection uncertainty fall short in that they are agnostic to such fine-grained characterisation of errors. In this work, we propose to reformulate the problem of finding "hard" images as a query-based hard image retrieval task, where queries are specific definitions of "hardness", and offer a simple and intuitive method that can solve this task for a large family of queries. Our method is entirely post-hoc, does not require ground-truth annotations, is independent of the choice of a detector, and relies on an efficient Monte Carlo estimation that uses a simple stochastic model in place of the ground-truth. We show experimentally that it can be applied successfully to a wide variety of queries for which it can reliably identify hard images for a given detector without any labelled data. We provide results on ranking and classification tasks using the widely used RetinaNet, Faster-RCNN, Mask-RCNN, and Cascade Mask-RCNN object detectors. The code for this project is available at https://github.com/fiveai/hardest.
Edward Ayers, Jonathan Sadeghi, John Redford, Romain Müller, Puneet K. Dokania
AAAI2
2019 Efficient training of interval Neural Networks for imprecise training data
Jonathan Sadeghi, Marco de Angelis 0002, Edoardo Patelli
Neural Networks1