Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter van Hardenberg

dblp:251/8335 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6295-9415ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
collaborative editing
0.812024
MyWebstrates: Webstrates as Local-first Software · UIST 2024
Distributed systems
distributed coordination and fault tolerance
0.812024
MyWebstrates: Webstrates as Local-first Software · UIST 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

peer-to-peer synchronization · 1.5conflict-free replicated data types · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MyWebstrates: Webstrates as Local-first Software
abstract
Webstrates are web substrates, a practical realization of shareable dynamic media under which distributability, shareability, and malleability are fundamental software principles. Webstrates blur the distinction between application and document in a way that enables users to share, repurpose, and refit software across a variety of domains, but its reliance on a central server constrains its use; it is at odds with personal and collective control of data; and limits applications to the web. We extend the fundamental principles to include interoperability and sovereignty over data and propose MyWebstrates, an implementation of Webstrates on top of a new, lower-level substrate for synchronization built around local-first software principles. MyWebstrates registers itself in the user’s browser and function as a piece of local software that can selectively synchronise data over sync servers or peer-to-peer connections. We show how MyWebstrates extends Webstrates to enable offline collaborative use, interoperate between Webstrates on non-web technologies such as Unity, and maintain personal and collective sovereignty over data. We demonstrate how this enables new types of applications of Webstrates and discuss limitations of this approach and new challenges that it reveals.
Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, James R. Eagan, Peter van Hardenberg
UIST3
2022 Peritext: A CRDT for Collaborative Rich Text Editing
abstract
Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) support decentralized collaborative editing of shared data, enabling peer-to-peer sharing and flexible branching and merging workflows. While there is extensive work on CRDTs for plain text, much less is known about CRDTs for rich text with formatting. No algorithms have been published, and existing open-source implementations do not always preserve user intent. In this paper, we describe a model of intent preservation in rich text editing, developed through a series of concurrent editing scenarios. We then describe Peritext, a CRDT algorithm for rich text that satisfies the criteria of our model. The key idea is to store formatting spans alongside the plaintext character sequence, linked to a stable identifier for the first and last character of each span, and then to derive the final formatted text from these spans in a deterministic way that ensures concurrent operations commute. We have prototyped our algorithm in TypeScript, validated it using randomized property-based testing, and integrated it with an editor UI. We also prove that our algorithm ensures convergence, and demonstrate its causality preservation and intention preservation properties.
Geoffrey Litt, Sarah Lim 0001, Martin Kleppmann, Peter van Hardenberg
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.4