Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikhila Nyapathy
dblp:252/4383
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › interaction techniques
natural language interface |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data Visualizations · CHI 2021 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization authoring
visualization specification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data Visualizations · CHI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
utterance characterization · 0.5online study · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data VisualizationsabstractNatural language interfaces (NLIs) for data visualization are becoming increasingly popular both in academic research and in commercial software. Yet, there is a lack of empirical understanding of how people specify visualizations through natural language. We conducted an online study (N = 102), showing participants a series of visualizations and asking them to provide utterances they would pose to generate the displayed charts. From the responses, we curated a dataset of 893 utterances and characterized the utterances according to (1) their phrasing (e.g., commands, queries, questions) and (2) the information they contained (e.g., chart types, data aggregations). To help guide future research and development, we contribute this utterance dataset and discuss its applications toward the creation and benchmarking of NLIs for visualization. Arjun Srinivasan, Nikhila Nyapathy, Bongshin Lee, Steven Mark Drucker, John T. Stasko |
CHI | 2 |