Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Victor Besnier
dblp:252/5048
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Time series and sequential data · 15% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Halton Scheduler for Masked Generative Image Transformer · ICLR 2025 Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional Diffusion · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Images · CVPR 2024 Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional Diffusion · CVPR 2024 Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › discrete generative model
masked generative image transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Halton Scheduler for Masked Generative Image Transformer · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Images · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
anomaly segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Images · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional Diffusion · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional Diffusion · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
industrial visual inspection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Images · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional Diffusion · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quasi-random low-discrepancy sequence · 0.9halton sequence · 0.9conditional diffusion · 0.8coherence-aware training · 0.8boosted random forest · 0.8anomaly map · 0.8local adversarial attack · 0.5ablation study · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Halton Scheduler for Masked Generative Image TransformerabstractMasked Generative Image Transformers (MaskGIT) have emerged as a scalable
and efficient image generation framework, able to deliver high-quality visuals with
low inference costs. However, MaskGIT’s token unmasking scheduler, an essential
component of the framework, has not received the attention it deserves. We analyze
the sampling objective in MaskGIT, based on the mutual information between
tokens, and elucidate its shortcomings. We then propose a new sampling strategy
based on our Halton scheduler instead of the original Confidence scheduler. More
precisely, our method selects the token’s position according to a quasi-random,
low-discrepancy Halton sequence. Intuitively, that method spreads the tokens
spatially, progressively covering the image uniformly at each step. Our analysis
shows that it allows reducing non-recoverable sampling errors, leading to simpler
hyper-parameters tuning and better quality images. Our scheduler does not require
retraining or noise injection and may serve as a simple drop-in replacement for
the original sampling strategy. Evaluation of both class-to-image synthesis on
ImageNet and text-to-image generation on the COCO dataset demonstrates that the
Halton scheduler outperforms the Confidence scheduler quantitatively by reducing
the FID and qualitatively by generating more diverse and more detailed images.
Our code is at https://github.com/valeoai/Halton-MaskGIT. Victor Besnier, Mickaël Chen, David Hurych, Eduardo Valle, Matthieu Cord |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial ImagesabstractAutomating visual inspection in industrial production lines is essential for increasing product quality across various industries. Anomaly detection (AD) methods serve as robust tools for this purpose. However, existing public datasets primarily consist of images without anomalies, limiting the practical application of AD methods in production settings. To address this challenge, we present (1) the Valeo Anomaly Dataset (VAD), a novel real-world industrial dataset comprising 5000 images, including 2000 instances of challenging real defects across more than 20 subclasses. Acknowledging that traditional AD methods struggle with this dataset, we introduce (2) Segmentation-based Anomaly Detector (SegAD). First, SegAD leverages anomaly maps as well as segmentation maps to compute local statistics. Next, SegAD uses these statistics and an optional supervised classifier score as input features for a Boosted Random Forest (BRF) classifier, yielding the final anomaly score. Our SegAD achieves state-of-the-art performance on both VAD (+2.1% AUROC) and the VisA dataset (+0.4% AUROC). The code and the models are publicly available11https://github.com/abc-125/segad. Aimira Baitieva, David Hurych, Victor Besnier |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2024 | Don't Drop Your Samples! Coherence-Aware Training Benefits Conditional DiffusionabstractConditional diffusion models are powerful generative models that can leverage various types of conditional information, such as class labels, segmentation masks, or text captions. However, in many real-world scenarios, conditional infor-mation may be noisy or unreliable due to human annotation errors or weak alignment. In this paper, we propose the Coherence-Aware Diffusion (CAD), a novel method that in-tegrates coherence in conditional information into diffusion models, allowing them to learn from noisy annotations with-out discarding data. We assume that each data point has an associated coherence score that reflects the quality of the conditional information. We then condition the diffusion model on both the conditional information and the coherence score. In this way, the model learns to ignore or discount the conditioning when the coherence is low. We show that CAD is theoretically sound and empirically effective on various conditional generation tasks. Moreover, we show that lever-aging coherence generates realistic and diverse samples that respect conditional information better than models trained on cleaned datasets where samples with low coherence have been discarded. Code and weights here. Nicolas Dufour, Victor Besnier, Vicky Kalogeiton, David Picard |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic SegmentationabstractIn this paper, we tackle the detection of out-of-distribution (OOD) objects in semantic segmentation. By analyzing the literature, we found that current methods are either accurate or fast but not both which limits their usability in real world applications. To get the best of both aspects, we propose to mitigate the common shortcomings by following four design principles: decoupling the OOD detection from the segmentation task, observing the entire segmentation network instead of just its output, generating training data for the OOD detector by leveraging blind spots in the segmentation network and focusing the generated data on localized regions in the image to simulate OOD objects. Our main contribution is a new OOD detection architecture called ObsNet associated with a dedicated training scheme based on Local Adversarial Attacks (LAA). We validate the soundness of our approach across numerous ablation studies. We also show it obtains top performances both in speed and accuracy when compared to ten recent methods of the literature on three different datasets. Victor Besnier, Andrei Bursuc, David Picard, Alexandre Briot |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Uncertainty for Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous DrivingabstractIn this paper, we show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving, by triggering a fallback behavior if a target accuracy cannot be guaranteed. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We propose to estimate this dissimilarity by training a deep neural architecture in parallel to the task-specific network. It allows this observer to be dedicated to the uncertainty estimation, and let the task-specific network make predictions. We propose to use self-supervision to train the observer, which implies that our method does not require additional training data. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods (e.g., MC Dropout), while delivering better results on safety-oriented evaluation metrics on the CamVid dataset, especially in the case of glare artifacts. Victor Besnier, David Picard, Alexandre Briot |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2020 | This Dataset Does Not Exist: Training Models from Generated ImagesabstractCurrent generative networks are increasingly proficient in generating high-resolution realistic images. These generative networks, especially the conditional ones, can potentially become a great tool for providing new image datasets. This naturally brings the question: Can we train a classifier only on the generated data? This potential availability of nearly unlimited amounts of training data challenges standard practices for training machine learning models, which have been crafted across the years for limited and fixed size datasets. In this work we investigate this question and its related challenges. We identify ways to improve significantly the performance over naive training on randomly generated images with regular heuristics. We propose three standalone techniques that can be applied at different stages of the pipeline, i.e., data generation, training on generated data, and deploying on real data. We evaluate our proposed approaches on a subset of the ImageNet dataset and show encouraging results compared to classifiers trained on real images. Victor Besnier, Himalaya Jain, Andrei Bursuc, Matthieu Cord, Patrick Pérez |
ICASSP | 1 |