Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sahana Ramnath
dblp:252/5822
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-2717-7685ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Machine translation · 17% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-text Rationales · ACL (1) 2023 Towards Interpreting BERT for Reading Comprehension Based QA · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM Juries · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
LLM-as-a-judge |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM Juries · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue evaluation
multi-turn dialogue evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM Juries · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
rationale generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward Distillation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › rationalization
self-rationalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward Distillation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Inference-Time Policy Adapters (IPA): Tailoring Extreme-Scale LMs without Fine-tuning · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › monolingual data augmentation
back-translation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › pretrained language model analysis
BERT analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Interpreting BERT for Reading Comprehension Based QA · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Interpreting BERT for Reading Comprehension Based QA · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gricean maxims · 0.9dialog acts · 0.9LLM jury · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.8multi-reward distillation · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.7policy adapters · 0.7transliteration hints · 0.5quality hints · 0.5back-translation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM JuriesabstractToday, large language models are widely used as judges to evaluate responses from other language models.Hence, it is imperative to benchmark and improve these LLM-judges on realworld language model usage: a typical humanassistant conversation is lengthy, and shows significant diversity in topics, intents, and requirements across turns, e.g.social interactions, task requests, feedback.We present AMULET, a framework that leverages pertinent linguistic concepts of dialog-acts and maxims to improve the accuracy of LLM-judges on preference data with complex, multi-turn conversational context.AMULET presents valuable insights about (a) the communicative structures and intents present in the conversation (dialog acts), and (b) the satisfaction of conversational principles (maxims) by the preference pair responses, and uses them to make judgments.On 4 challenging datasets, AMULET shows that (a) humans frequently (60-70% of the time) change their intents from one turn of the conversation to the next, and (b) in ∼75% of instances, the preference pair responses can be differentiated via dialog acts and/or maxims, reiterating the latter's significance in judging such data.AMULET can be used either as a judge by applying the framework to a single LLM, or integrated into a jury with different LLM judges; our judges and juries show strong improvements on relevant baselines for all 4 datasets.(code, data). Sahana Ramnath, Anurag Mudgil, Brihi Joshi, Skyler Hallinan, Xiang Ren 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | CAVE: Controllable Authorship Verification ExplanationsabstractSahana Ramnath, Kartik Pandey, Elizabeth Boschee, Xiang Ren. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Sahana Ramnath, Kartik Pandey, Elizabeth Boschee, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |
| 2024 | Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward DistillationabstractLarge language models (LMs) are capable of generating free-text rationales to aid question answering. However, prior work 1) suggests that useful self-rationalization is emergent only at significant scales (e.g., 175B parameter GPT-3); and 2) focuses largely on downstream performance, ignoring the semantics of the rationales themselves, e.g., are they faithful, true, and helpful for humans? In this work, we enable small-scale LMs (∼200x smaller than GPT-3) to generate rationales that not only improve downstream task performance, but are also more plausible, consistent, and diverse, assessed both by automatic and human evaluation. Our method, MaRio (Multi-rewArd RatIOnalization), is a multi-reward conditioned self-rationalization algorithm that optimizes multiple distinct properties like plausibility, diversity and consistency. Results on three difficult question-answering datasets StrategyQA, QuaRel and OpenBookQA show that not only does MaRio improve task accuracy, but it also improves the self-rationalization quality of small LMs across the aforementioned axes better than a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) baseline. Extensive human evaluations confirm that MaRio rationales are preferred vs. SFT rationales, as well as qualitative improvements in plausibility and consistency. Sahana Ramnath, Brihi Joshi, Skyler Hallinan, Ximing Lu, Liunian Harold Li, Aaron Chan, Jack Hessel, Yejin Choi 0001, Xiang Ren 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-text RationalesabstractBrihi Joshi, Ziyi Liu, Sahana Ramnath, Aaron Chan, Zhewei Tong, Shaoliang Nie, Qifan Wang, Yejin Choi, Xiang Ren. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Brihi Joshi, Ziyi Liu 0007, Sahana Ramnath, Aaron Chan, Zhewei Tong, Shaoliang Nie, Qifan Wang 0001, Yejin Choi 0001, Xiang Ren 0001 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Inference-Time Policy Adapters (IPA): Tailoring Extreme-Scale LMs without Fine-tuningabstractXiming Lu, Faeze Brahman, Peter West, Jaehun Jung, Khyathi Chandu, Abhilasha Ravichander, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Liwei Jiang, Sahana Ramnath, Nouha Dziri, Jillian Fisher, Bill Lin, Skyler Hallinan, Lianhui Qin, Xiang Ren, Sean Welleck, Yejin Choi. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023. Ximing Lu, Faeze Brahman, Peter West, Jaehun Jung, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Abhilasha Ravichander, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Sahana Ramnath, Nouha Dziri, Jillian Fisher, Bill Y. Lin, Skyler Hallinan, Lianhui Qin, Xiang Ren 0001, Sean Welleck, Yejin Choi 0001 |
EMNLP | 9 |
| 2021 | HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration HintsabstractBack-translation (BT) of target monolingual corpora is a widely used data augmentation strategy for neural machine translation (NMT), especially for low-resource language pairs.To improve effectiveness of the available BT data, we introduce HintedBT-a family of techniques which provides hints (through tags) to the encoder and decoder.First, we propose a novel method of using both high and low quality BT data by providing hints (as source tags on the encoder) to the model about the quality of each source-target pair.We don't filter out low quality data but instead show that these hints enable the model to learn effectively from noisy data.Second, we address the problem of predicting whether a source token needs to be translated or transliterated to the target language, which is common in crossscript translation tasks (i.e., where source and target do not share the written script).For such cases, we propose training the model with additional hints (as target tags on the decoder) that provide information about the operation required on the source (translation or both translation and transliteration).We conduct experiments and detailed analyses on standard WMT benchmarks for three crossscript low/medium-resource language pairs: {Hindi,Gujarati,Tamil}→English.Our methods compare favorably with five strong and well established baselines.We show that using these hints, both separately and together, significantly improves translation quality and leads to state-of-the-art performance in all three language pairs in corresponding bilingual settings. Sahana Ramnath, Melvin Johnson, Abhirut Gupta, Aravindan Raghuveer |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Towards Interpreting BERT for Reading Comprehension Based QAabstractBERT and its variants have achieved stateof-the-art performance in various NLP tasks.Since then, various works have been proposed to analyze the linguistic information being captured in BERT.However, the current works do not provide an insight into how BERT is able to achieve near human-level performance on the task of Reading Comprehension based Question Answering.In this work, we attempt to interpret BERT for RCQA.Since BERT layers do not have predefined roles, we define a layer's role or functionality using Integrated Gradients.Based on the defined roles, we perform a preliminary analysis across all layers.We observed that the initial layers focus on query-passage interaction, whereas later layers focus more on contextual understanding and enhancing the answer prediction.Specifically for quantifier questions (how much/how many), we notice that BERT focuses on confusing words (i.e., on other numerical quantities in the passage) in the later layers, but still manages to predict the answer correctly.The fine-tuning and analysis scripts will be publicly available at https://github.com/ iitmnlp/BERT-Analysis-RCQA. Sahana Ramnath, Preksha Nema, Deep Sahni, Mitesh M. Khapra |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |