Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leo Zhang
dblp:252/8493
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 96% Robot navigation and mapping · 4% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SymDiff: Equivariant Diffusion via Stochastic Symmetrisation · ICLR 2025 Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SymDiff: Equivariant Diffusion via Stochastic Symmetrisation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SymDiff: Equivariant Diffusion via Stochastic Symmetrisation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › sensor-based navigation
LiDAR-based navigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic symmetrisation · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.8geodesic interpolation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FedCSGA: Evolutionary client selection with joint statistical and system heterogeneity in federated learning
Ghani Haider, Majid Kundroo, Leo Zhang, Jinchul Choi, Taehong Kim |
J. Syst. Archit. | 3 |
| 2025 | SymDiff: Equivariant Diffusion via Stochastic SymmetrisationabstractWe propose SymDiff, a method for constructing equivariant diffusion models using the framework of stochastic symmetrisation. SymDiff resembles a learned data augmentation that is deployed at sampling time, and is lightweight, computationally efficient, and easy to implement on top of arbitrary off-the-shelf models. In contrast to previous work, SymDiff typically does not require any neural network components that are intrinsically equivariant, avoiding the need for complex parameterisations or the use of higher-order geometric features. Instead, our method can leverage highly scalable modern architectures as drop-in replacements for these more constrained alternatives. We show that this additional flexibility yields significant empirical benefit for E(3)-equivariant molecular generation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of symmetrisation to generative modelling, suggesting its potential in this domain more generally. Leo Zhang, Kianoosh Ashouritaklimi, Yee Whye Teh, Rob Cornish |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | 3D Face Recognition with Contrastive Learning Network on Low-Quality Data
Yaping Jing, Ajmal Mian, Leo Zhang, Shang Gao 0003, Xuequan Lu |
CGI (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data ManifoldabstractMatching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of $\textit{Euclidean geometry}$, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction. Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong 0001, Michael M. Bronstein, Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni |
NeurIPS | 4 |