Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrey Lavrinenko

dblp:253/5863 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 46% Time series and sequential data · 27% Video understanding and tracking · 27%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
temporal alignment
0.912025
TimePoint: Accelerated Time Series Alignment via Self-Supervised Keypoint and Descriptor Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series analysis
0.912025
TimePoint: Accelerated Time Series Alignment via Self-Supervised Keypoint and Descriptor Learning · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan execution
concurrent planning and execution
0.812024
Planning and Acting While the Clock Ticks · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal planning
0.812024
Planning and Acting While the Clock Ticks · ICAPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.9dynamic time warping · 0.9diffeomorphism · 0.9meta-reasoning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TimePoint: Accelerated Time Series Alignment via Self-Supervised Keypoint and Descriptor Learning
abstract
Fast and scalable alignment of time series is a fundamental challenge in many domains. The standard solution, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), struggles with poor scalability and sensitivity to noise. We introduce TimePoint, a self-supervised method that dramatically accelerates DTW-based alignment while typically improving alignment accuracy by learning keypoints and descriptors from synthetic data. Inspired by 2D keypoint detection but carefully adapted to the unique challenges of 1D signals, TimePoint leverages efficient 1D diffeomorphisms, which effectively model nonlinear time warping, to generate realistic training data. This adaptation, along with fully convolutional and wavelet convolutional architectures, enables the extraction of informative keypoints and descriptors. Applying DTW to these sparse representations yields major speedups and typically higher alignment accuracy than standard DTW applied to the full signals. Despite being trained solely on synthetic data, TimePoint generalizes well to real-world time series. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TimePoint consistently achieves faster and more accurate alignments than standard DTW, making it a scalable solution for time-series analysis. Our code is available at https://github.com/ BGU-CS-VIL/TimePoint.
Ron Shapira Weber, Shahar Ben Ishay, Andrey Lavrinenko, Shahaf E. Finder, Oren Freifeld
ICML3
2024 Planning and Acting While the Clock Ticks
abstract
Standard temporal planning assumes that planning takes place offline, and then execution starts at time 0. Recently, situated temporal planning was introduced, where planning starts at time 0, and execution occurs after planning terminates. Situated temporal planning reflects a more realistic scenario where time passes during planning. However, in situated temporal planning a complete plan must be generated before any action is executed. In some problems with time pressure, timing is too tight to complete planning before the first action must be executed. For example, an autonomous car that has a truck backing towards it should probably move out of the way now, and plan how to get to its destination later. In this paper, we propose a new problem setting: concurrent planning and execution, in which actions can be dispatched (executed) before planning terminates. Unlike previous work on planning and execution, we must handle wall clock deadlines that affect action applicability and goal achievement (as in situated planning) while also supporting dispatching actions before a complete plan has been found. We extend previous work on metareasoning for situated temporal planning to develop an algorithm for this new setting. Our empirical evaluation shows that when there is strong time pressure, our approach outperforms situated temporal planning.
Andrew Coles, Erez Karpas, Andrey Lavrinenko, Wheeler Ruml, Solomon Eyal Shimony, Shahaf S. Shperberg
ICAPS3