Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ines Reinig

dblp:253/9206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
political text analysis
0.912025
Moral Framing in Politics (MFiP): A new resource and models for moral framing · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.912025
Moral Framing in Politics (MFiP): A new resource and models for moral framing · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.312025
Moral Framing in Politics (MFiP): A new resource and models for moral framing · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

moral foundations theory · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GePaDeSE: A New Resource for Clause-Level Aspect in German Parliamentary Debates
Julian Schlenker, Ines Rehbein, Lilly Brauner, Florian Ertz, Ines Reinig, Simone Paolo Ponzetto
LREC5
2025 Moral Framing in Politics (MFiP): A new resource and models for moral framing
abstract
The construct of morality permeates our entire lives and influences our behavior and how we perceive others.It therefore comes at no surprise that morality also plays an important role in politics, as morally framed arguments are perceived as more appealing and persuasive.Thus, being able to identify moral framing in political communication and to detect subtle differences in politicians' moral framing can provide the basis for many interesting analyses in the political sciences.In the paper, we release MoralFramingInPolitics (MFiP), a new corpus of German parliamentary debates where the speakers' moral framing has been coded, using the framework of Moral Foundations Theory (MFT).Our fine-grained annotations distinguish different types of moral frames and also include narrative roles, together with the moral foundations for each frame.We then present models for frame type and moral foundation classification and explore the benefits of data augmentation (DA) and contrastive learning (CL) for the two tasks.All data and code will be made available to the research community.
Ines Rehbein, Ines Reinig, Simone Paolo Ponzetto
EMNLP2
2024 How to Do Politics with Words: Investigating Speech Acts in Parliamentary Debates
abstract
This paper presents a new perspective on framing through the lens of speech acts and investigates how politicians make use of different pragmatic speech act functions in political debates. To that end, we created a new resource of German parliamentary debates, annotated with fine-grained speech act types. Our hierarchical annotation scheme distinguishes between cooperation and conflict communication, further structured into six subtypes, such as informative, declarative or argumentative-critical speech acts, with 14 fine-grained classes at the lowest level. We present classification baselines on our new data and show that the fine-grained classes in our schema can be predicted with an avg. F1 of around 82.0%. We then use our classifier to analyse the use of speech acts in a large corpus of parliamentary debates over a time span from 2003–2023.
Ines Reinig, Ines Rehbein, Simone Paolo Ponzetto
LREC/COLING1
2024 ACLSum: A New Dataset for Aspect-based Summarization of Scientific Publications
abstract
Sotaro Takeshita, Tommaso Green, Ines Reinig, Kai Eckert, Simone Ponzetto. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Sotaro Takeshita, Tommaso Green, Ines Reinig, Kai Eckert 0001, Simone Paolo Ponzetto
NAACL-HLT3