Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao
dblp:253/9933 · also Hoàng Nguyen
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4217-0983ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 49% Authentication and access control · 37% Systems and software security · 15% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 62% Empirical software engineering · 38% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025 Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy engineering
privacy by design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025 |
Authentication and access control
access control policy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023 |
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023 |
Systems and software security › security policy enforcement
runtime enforcement |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
logic-based policy enforcement · 1.7controlled experiment · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mechanizing Privacy by DesignabstractPrivacy by design requires integrating data protection into systems from the outset, during their design, rather than building it in later. Related legislation does not specify how to achieve this and mainstream languages and frameworks lack support for privacy by design. To address this long-standing problem, we have developed different, effective technical solutions. First, we have developed powerful logic-based tools that enforce formal data protection policies at runtime by controlling relevant system actions. Second, we have proposed methods and tools for integrating privacy models into system design models, enabling model-driven privacy enforcement. We report on our methods, tools, and practical experiences using them. David A. Basin, François Hublet, Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao |
CCS | 4 |
| 2024 | Model-driven PrivacyabstractData protection regulations in many countries require IT systems to implement baseline privacy requirements like purpose limitation and consent as mandated by the GDPR. Such requirements are often specified in the system’s privacy policy and are challenging to implement as system developers must address them consistently and in a cross-cutting manner. Moreover, without a formal connection between a system’s privacy policy and its implementation, the system’s correctness and evolution are extremely difficult to attain. We propose a model-driven development methodology that incorporates privacy policies into the system design. Namely, we define a system’s privacy model, which has precise semantics and is used to specify privacy policies. We provide semantic-preserving model transformations that generate system implementations that enforce the given privacy policies by design. We implement two such model transformations, targeting C# and Python system implementations. We evaluate our methodology on three substantial case studies and show the enforcement of privacy policies related to purpose limitation and consent. Our evaluation also demonstrates our approach’s generality, effectiveness, and modest overhead. Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao, David A. Basin |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 2 |
| 2023 | Is Modeling Access Control Worth It?abstractImplementing access control policies is an error-prone task that can have severe consequences for the security of software applications. Model-driven approaches have been proposed in the literature and associated tools have been developed with the goal of reducing the complexity of this task and helping developers to produce secure software efficiently. Nevertheless, there is a lack of empirical data supporting the advantages of model-driven security approaches over code-centric approaches, which are the de-facto industry standard for software development. David A. Basin, Juan Guarnizo, Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao, Martín Ochoa |
CCS | 4 |