Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao

dblp:253/9933 · also Hoàng Nguyen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4217-0983ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 49% Authentication and access control · 37% Systems and software security · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 62% Empirical software engineering · 38%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
1.122025
Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025
Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023
Privacy and data protection › privacy engineering
privacy by design
0.912025
Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025
Authentication and access control
access control policy
0.712023
Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study
0.712023
Is Modeling Access Control Worth It? · CCS 2023
Systems and software security › security policy enforcement
runtime enforcement
0.312025
Mechanizing Privacy by Design · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logic-based policy enforcement · 1.7controlled experiment · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mechanizing Privacy by Design
abstract
Privacy by design requires integrating data protection into systems from the outset, during their design, rather than building it in later. Related legislation does not specify how to achieve this and mainstream languages and frameworks lack support for privacy by design. To address this long-standing problem, we have developed different, effective technical solutions. First, we have developed powerful logic-based tools that enforce formal data protection policies at runtime by controlling relevant system actions. Second, we have proposed methods and tools for integrating privacy models into system design models, enabling model-driven privacy enforcement. We report on our methods, tools, and practical experiences using them.
David A. Basin, François Hublet, Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao
CCS4
2024 Model-driven Privacy
abstract
Data protection regulations in many countries require IT systems to implement baseline privacy requirements like purpose limitation and consent as mandated by the GDPR. Such requirements are often specified in the system’s privacy policy and are challenging to implement as system developers must address them consistently and in a cross-cutting manner. Moreover, without a formal connection between a system’s privacy policy and its implementation, the system’s correctness and evolution are extremely difficult to attain. We propose a model-driven development methodology that incorporates privacy policies into the system design. Namely, we define a system’s privacy model, which has precise semantics and is used to specify privacy policies. We provide semantic-preserving model transformations that generate system implementations that enforce the given privacy policies by design. We implement two such model transformations, targeting C# and Python system implementations. We evaluate our methodology on three substantial case studies and show the enforcement of privacy policies related to purpose limitation and consent. Our evaluation also demonstrates our approach’s generality, effectiveness, and modest overhead.
Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao, David A. Basin
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2
2023 Is Modeling Access Control Worth It?
abstract
Implementing access control policies is an error-prone task that can have severe consequences for the security of software applications. Model-driven approaches have been proposed in the literature and associated tools have been developed with the goal of reducing the complexity of this task and helping developers to produce secure software efficiently. Nevertheless, there is a lack of empirical data supporting the advantages of model-driven security approaches over code-centric approaches, which are the de-facto industry standard for software development.
David A. Basin, Juan Guarnizo, Srdan Krstic, Hoang Nguyen Phuoc Bao, Martín Ochoa
CCS4