Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tristan Pollner

dblp:254/1029 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8793-1531ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 9 · 2 first-author · 8 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 48% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 29% Mathematical optimization · 18%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online matching
2.742025
New Philosopher Inequalities for Online Bayesian Matching, via Pivotal Sampling · SODA 2025
Approximating Optimum Online for Capacitated Resource Allocation · EC 2024
Improved Online Contention Resolution for Matchings and Applications to the Gig Economy · EC 2022
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
prophet inequality
1.022025
New Philosopher Inequalities for Online Bayesian Matching, via Pivotal Sampling · SODA 2025
Online Stochastic Max-Weight Bipartite Matching: Beyond Prophet Inequalities · EC 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
1.012026
Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching · SODA 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
bipartite matching
1.012026
Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching · SODA 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching
1.012026
Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching · SODA 2026
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
1.022021
Online Stochastic Max-Weight Bipartite Matching: Beyond Prophet Inequalities · EC 2021
Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
rounding
1.012026
Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching · SODA 2026
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic combinatorial optimization
online stochastic matching
0.912025
New Philosopher Inequalities for Online Bayesian Matching, via Pivotal Sampling · SODA 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation
online resource allocation
0.812024
Approximating Optimum Online for Capacitated Resource Allocation · EC 2024
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
approximate matching
0.512021
Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
matching theory
0.512021
Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.312026
Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching · SODA 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
market design
0.212022
Improved Online Contention Resolution for Matchings and Applications to the Gig Economy · EC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation algorithm · 1.3rounding · 1.0linear programming · 1.0pivotal sampling · 0.9online algorithms · 0.6contention resolution schemes · 0.6coupling argument · 0.5competitive analysis · 0.5approximation analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching
Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, Anders Wikum
SODA1
2025 A Bicriterion Concentration Inequality and Prophet Inequalities for k-Fold Matroid Unions
abstract
We investigate prophet inequalities with competitive ratios approaching 1, seeking to generalize k-uniform matroids. We first show that large girth does not suffice: for all k, there exists a matroid of girth ≥ k and a prophet inequality instance on that matroid whose optimal competitive ratio is 1/2. Next, we show k-fold matroid unions do suffice: we provide a prophet inequality with competitive ratio 1-O(√{(log k)/k}) for any k-fold matroid union. Our prophet inequality follows from an online contention resolution scheme. The key technical ingredient in our online contention resolution scheme is a novel bicriterion concentration inequality for arbitrary monotone 1-Lipschitz functions over independent items which may be of independent interest. Applied to our particular setting, our bicriterion concentration inequality yields "Chernoff-strength" concentration for a 1-Lipschitz function that is not (approximately) self-bounding.
Noga Alon, Nick Gravin, Tristan Pollner, Aviad Rubinstein, Hongao Wang, S. Matthew Weinberg, Qianfan Zhang 0002
ITCS3
2025 New Philosopher Inequalities for Online Bayesian Matching, via Pivotal Sampling
abstract
We study the polynomial-time approximability of the optimal online stochastic bipartite matching algorithm, initiated by Papadimitriou et al. (EC’21). Here, nodes on one side of the graph are given upfront, while at each time t, an online node and its edge weights are drawn from a time-dependent distribution. The optimal algorithm is PSPACE-hard to approximate within some universal constant. We refer to this optimal algorithm, which requires time to think (compute), as a philosopher, and refer to polynomial-time online approximations of the above as philosopher inequalities. The best known philosopher inequality for online matching yields a 0.652-approximation. In contrast, the best possible prophet inequality, or approximation of the optimum offline solution, is 0.5.
Mark Braverman, Mahsa Derakhshan, Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, David Wajc
SODA3
2024 Approximating Optimum Online for Capacitated Resource Allocation
abstract
We study online capacitated resource allocation, a natural generalization of online stochastic max-weight bipartite matching. This problem is motivated by ride-sharing and Internet advertising applications, where online arrivals may have the capacity to serve multiple offline users.
Alexander Braun 0002, Thomas Kesselheim, Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi
EC3
2022 Optimal Item Pricing in Online Combinatorial Auctions
José Correa 0001, Andrés Cristi, Andrés Fielbaum, Tristan Pollner, S. Matthew Weinberg
IPCO4
2022 Improved Online Contention Resolution for Matchings and Applications to the Gig Economy
abstract
No abstract available.
Tristan Pollner, Mohammad Roghani, Amin Saberi, David Wajc
EC1
2021 Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment
abstract
We consider a model for repeated stochastic matching where compatibility is probabilistic, is realized the first time agents are matched, and persists in the future. Such a model has applications in the gig economy, kidney exchange, and mentorship matching. We ask whether adecentralized matching process can approximate the optimal online algorithm. In particular, we consider a decentralizedstable matching process where agents match with the most compatible partner who does not prefer matching with someone else, and known compatible pairs continue matching in all future rounds. We demonstrate that the above process provides a 0.316-approximation to the optimal online algorithm for matching on general graphs. We also provide a 1/7-approximation for many-to-one bipartite matching, a 1/11-approximation for capacitated matching on general graphs, and a 1/2k-approximation for forming teams of up to k agents. Our results rely on a novel coupling argument that decomposes the successful edges of the optimal online algorithm in terms of their round-by-round comparison with stable matching.
Mobin Y. Jeloudar, Irene Lo, Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi
EC3
2021 Online Stochastic Max-Weight Bipartite Matching: Beyond Prophet Inequalities
abstract
The rich literature on online Bayesian selection problems has long focused on so-called prophet inequalities, which compare the gain of an online algorithm to that of a "prophet" who knows the future. An equally-natural, though significantly less well-studied benchmark is the optimum online algorithm, which may be omnipotent (i.e., computationally-unbounded), but not omniscient. What is the computational complexity of the optimum online? How well can a polynomial-time algorithm approximate it?
Christos H. Papadimitriou, Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, David Wajc
EC2
2020 New Query Lower Bounds for Submodular Function Minimization
abstract
We consider submodular function minimization in the oracle model: given black-box access to a submodular set function f:2^[n] → ℝ, find an element of arg min_S {f(S)} using as few queries to f(⋅) as possible. State-of-the-art algorithms succeed with Õ(n²) queries [Yin Tat Lee et al., 2015], yet the best-known lower bound has never been improved beyond n [Nicholas J. A. Harvey, 2008]. We provide a query lower bound of 2n for submodular function minimization, a 3n/2-2 query lower bound for the non-trivial minimizer of a symmetric submodular function, and a binom{n}{2} query lower bound for the non-trivial minimizer of an asymmetric submodular function. Our 3n/2-2 lower bound results from a connection between SFM lower bounds and a novel concept we term the cut dimension of a graph. Interestingly, this yields a 3n/2-2 cut-query lower bound for finding the global mincut in an undirected, weighted graph, but we also prove it cannot yield a lower bound better than n+1 for s-t mincut, even in a directed, weighted graph.
Andrei Graur, Tristan Pollner, Vidhya Ramaswamy, S. Matthew Weinberg
ITCS2