Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditi Laddha
dblp:254/1179
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9781-1402ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 36% Algorithms and data structures · 28% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 13% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational geometry › high-dimensional geometry › volume computation
convex body volume estimation |
1.5 | 2 | 2026 | Reducing Isotropy and Volume to KLS: Faster Rounding and Volume Algorithms · J. ACM 2026 Reducing isotropy and volume to KLS: an o*(n3ψ2) volume algorithm · STOC 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs · SODA 2024 Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection Algorithms · FOCS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Reducing Isotropy and Volume to KLS: Faster Rounding and Volume Algorithms · J. ACM 2026 |
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs · SODA 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs · SODA 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › welfare maximization
nash social welfare |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs · SODA 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection Algorithms · FOCS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › conic optimization
determinant maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection Algorithms · FOCS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint › matroid optimization
matroid intersection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection Algorithms · FOCS 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-And-Run Mixes Fast · SoCG 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
markov chain monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-And-Run Mixes Fast · SoCG 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
mixing time |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-And-Run Mixes Fast · SoCG 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-And-Run Mixes Fast · SoCG 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Strong self-concordance and sampling · STOC 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
dikin walk |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Strong self-concordance and sampling · STOC 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
interior point methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Strong self-concordance and sampling · STOC 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Strong self-concordance and sampling · STOC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix multiplication · 1.5membership oracle · 1.0nonconvex programming · 0.8convex programming · 0.8KL divergence · 0.8exchange graph · 0.6alternating negative cycle · 0.6membership oracle model · 0.5KLS constant · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Reducing Isotropy and Volume to KLS: Faster Rounding and Volume AlgorithmsabstractWe show that the volume of a convex body in \(\mathbb {R}^{n}\) specified in the general membership oracle model can be computed to within relative error \(\varepsilon \gt 0\) using \(\widetilde{O}(n^{3.5}\psi ^{2} + n^3/\varepsilon ^{2})\) oracle queries, where \(\psi\) is the KLS constant. With the current bound of \(\psi =\widetilde{O}(1)\) , this gives an \(\widetilde{O}(n^{3.5} + n^3/\varepsilon ^{2})\) algorithm, improving on the Lovász-Vempala \(\widetilde{O}(n^{4}/\varepsilon ^{2})\) algorithm from 2003. The main new ingredient is an \(\widetilde{O}(n^{3}\psi ^{2})\) algorithm for isotropic transformation of a well-rounded convex body; we apply this iteratively to isotropize a general convex body. Following this, we can apply the \(\widetilde{O}(n^{3}/\varepsilon ^{2})\) volume algorithm of Cousins and Vempala for well-rounded convex bodies. We also give an efficient implementation of the new algorithm for convex polytopes defined by m inequalities in \(\mathbb {R}^{n}\) : polytope volume can be estimated in time \(\widetilde{O}(mn^{c+0.5}+mn^{c}/\varepsilon ^{2})\) where c < 3.2 depends on the current matrix multiplication exponent and also improves on the previous best bound. Aditi Laddha, Yin Tat Lee, Santosh S. Vempala |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 2024 | Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex ProgramsabstractIn an instance of the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, we are given a set of m indivisible items, G, and n agents, A, where each agent i ∈ A has a valuation vij ≥ 0 for each item j ∈ G. In addition, every agent i has a non-negative weight wi such that the weights collectively sum up to 1. The goal is to find an assignment σ : G → A that maximizes . When all the weights equal to , the problem reduces to the classical Nash Social Welfare problem, which has recently received much attention. In this work, we present a -approximation algorithm for the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, where denotes the KL-divergence between the distribution w and the uniform distribution on [n]. Adam Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu, Mohit Singh |
SODA | 2 |
| 2023 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-and-Run Mixes Fast
Aditi Laddha, Santosh S. Vempala |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 1 |
| 2022 | A Unified Approach to Discrepancy MinimizationabstractWe study a unified approach and algorithm for constructive discrepancy minimization based on a stochastic process. By varying the parameters of the process, one can recover various state-of-the-art results. We demonstrate the flexibility of the method by deriving a discrepancy bound for smoothed instances, which interpolates between known bounds for worst-case and random instances. Nikhil Bansal 0001, Aditi Laddha, Santosh S. Vempala |
APPROX/RANDOM | 2 |
| 2022 | Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection AlgorithmsabstractDeterminant maximization problem gives a general framework that models problems arising in as diverse fields as statistics [1], convex geometry [2], fair allocations [3], combinatorics [4], spectral graph theory [5], network design, and random processes [6]. In an instance of a determinant maximization problem, we are given a collection of vectors $U=\{v_{1},\cdots,\ v_{n}\}\subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$, and a goal is to pick a subset $S\subseteq U$ of given vectors to maximize the determinant of the matrix $\displaystyle \sum_{i\in S}v_{i}v_{i}^{\text{T}}$. Often, the set S of picked vectors must satisfy additional combinatorial constraints such as cardinality constraint $(|S|\leq k)$ or matroid constraint $(S$ is a basis of a matroid defined on the vectors). In this paper, we give a polynomial-time deterministic algorithm that returns a $r^{O(r)}$-approximation for any matroid of rank $r \leq d$. This improves previous results that give $e^{O(r^{2})}$-approximation algorithms relying on $e^{O(r)}$-approximate estimation algorithms [4], [7] –[9] for any r$\leq$d. All previous results use convex relaxations and their relationship to stable polynomials and strongly $\log$-concave polynomials or non-convex relaxations for the problem [10]. In contrast, our algorithm builds on combinatorial algorithms for matroid intersection, which iteratively improve any solution by finding an alternating negative cycle in the exchange graph defined by the matroids. While the $\det(.)$ function is not linear, we show that taking appropriate linear approximations at each iteration suffice to give the improved approximation algorithm. Adam Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu, Mohit Singh, Prasad Tetali |
FOCS | 2 |
| 2021 | Convergence of Gibbs Sampling: Coordinate Hit-And-Run Mixes FastabstractThe Gibbs Sampler is a general method for sampling high-dimensional distributions, dating back to 1971. In each step of the Gibbs Sampler, we pick a random coordinate and re-sample that coordinate from the distribution induced by fixing all the other coordinates. While it has become widely used over the past half-century, guarantees of efficient convergence have been elusive. We show that for a convex body K in ℝⁿ with diameter D, the mixing time of the Coordinate Hit-and-Run (CHAR) algorithm on K is polynomial in n and D. We also give a lower bound on the mixing rate of CHAR, showing that it is strictly worse than hit-and-run and the ball walk in the worst case. Aditi Laddha, Santosh S. Vempala |
SoCG | 1 |
| 2021 | Reducing isotropy and volume to KLS: an o*(n3ψ2) volume algorithmabstractWe show that the volume of a convex body in Rn in the general membership oracle model can be computed to within relative error ε using O(n3ψ2/ε2) oracle queries, where ψ is the KLS constant. With the current bound of ψ=O(no(1)), this gives an O(n3+o(1)/ε2) algorithm, the first improvement on the Lovász-Vempala O(n4/ε2) algorithm from 2003. The main new ingredient is an O(n3ψ2) algorithm for isotropic transformation, following which we can apply the O(n3/ε2) volume algorithm of Cousins and Vempala for well-rounded convex bodies. A positive resolution of the KLS conjecture would imply an O(n3/є2) volume algorithm. We also give an efficient implementation of the new algorithm for convex polytopes defined by m inequalities in Rn: polytope volume can be estimated in time O(mnc/ε2) where c<3.2 depends on the current matrix multiplication exponent and improves on the previous best bound. Aditi Laddha, Yin Tat Lee, Santosh S. Vempala |
STOC | 2 |
| 2020 | Strong self-concordance and samplingabstractMotivated by the Dikin walk, we develop aspects of the interior-point theory for sampling in high dimension. Specifically, we introduce the notions of strong self-concordance and symmetry for a barrier. These properties imply that the Dikin walk defined using a strongly self-concordant barrier with symmetry parameter ν mixes in Õ(nν) steps from a warm start for a convex body in ℝ n . For many natural barriers, ν is roughly bounded by ν, the standard self-concordance parameter. We also show that these properties hold for the Lee-Sidford barrier. As a consequence, we obtain the first walk that mixes in Õ(n 2) steps for an arbitrary polytope in ℝ n . Strong self-concordance for other barriers leads to an interesting (and unexpected) connection — for the universal and entropic barriers, it is implied by the KLS conjecture. Aditi Laddha, Yin Tat Lee, Santosh S. Vempala |
STOC | 1 |