Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhihan Jin

dblp:254/2718 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 52% Approximation and online algorithms · 18% Algorithms and data structures · 18%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.512021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
0.512021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021
Computational complexity › counting problems › approximate counting
permanent approximation
0.512021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021
Algorithms and data structures › exact algorithms
quasi-polynomial time algorithms
0.512021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021
Computational complexity › lower bounds
superpolynomial lower bounds
0.412020
Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descent · ICML 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms › quantum sampling
bosonsampling
0.112021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum supremacy
0.112021
Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent · 0.9polynomial-time approximation scheme · 0.5statistical query algorithms · 0.4statistical query algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler
abstract
The algorithm and complexity of approximating the permanent of a matrix is an extensively studied topic. Recently, its connection with quantum supremacy and more specifically BosonSampling draws a special attention to the average-case approximation problem of the permanent of random matrices with zero or small mean value for each entry. Eldar and Mehraban (FOCS 2018) gave a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for random matrices with mean at least 1/polyloglog(n). In this paper, we improve the result by designing a deterministic quasi-polynomial time algorithm and a PTAS for random matrices whose module of mean is at least 1/ polylog(n). We note that if the algorithm can be further improved to work with a mean value that is a sufficiently small 1/poly(n), it will disprove a central conjecture for quantum supremacy. Our algorithm is also much simpler and has a better and flexible trade-off for running time. The running time can be quasi-polynomial in both n and 1/∊, or PTAS (polynomial in n but exponential in 1/∊), where ∊ is the approximation parameter.
Zheng-Feng Ji, Zhihan Jin, Pinyan Lu
SODA2
2020 Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descent
abstract
We give the first superpolynomial lower bounds for learning one-layer neural networks with respect to the Gaussian distribution for a broad class of algorithms. In the regression setting, we prove that gradient descent run on any classifier with respect to square loss will fail to achieve small test error in polynomial time. Prior work held only for gradient descent run with small batch sizes and sufficiently smooth classifiers. For classification, we give a stronger result, namely that any statistical query (SQ) algorithm will fail to achieve small test error in polynomial time. Our lower bounds hold for commonly used activations such as ReLU and sigmoid. The core of our result relies on a novel construction of a simple family of neural networks that are exactly orthogonal with respect to all spherically symmetric distributions.
Surbhi Goel, Aravind Gollakota, Zhihan Jin, Sushrut Karmalkar, Adam R. Klivans
ICML3