Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhihan Jin
dblp:254/2718
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 52% Approximation and online algorithms · 18% Algorithms and data structures · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Computational complexity
average-case complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Computational complexity › counting problems › approximate counting
permanent approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › exact algorithms
quasi-polynomial time algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Computational complexity › lower bounds
superpolynomial lower bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descent · ICML 2020 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms › quantum sampling
bosonsampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum supremacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and Simpler · SODA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 0.9polynomial-time approximation scheme · 0.5statistical query algorithms · 0.4statistical query algorithm · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Approximating Permanent of Random Matrices with Vanishing Mean: Made Better and SimplerabstractThe algorithm and complexity of approximating the permanent of a matrix is an extensively studied topic. Recently, its connection with quantum supremacy and more specifically BosonSampling draws a special attention to the average-case approximation problem of the permanent of random matrices with zero or small mean value for each entry. Eldar and Mehraban (FOCS 2018) gave a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for random matrices with mean at least 1/polyloglog(n). In this paper, we improve the result by designing a deterministic quasi-polynomial time algorithm and a PTAS for random matrices whose module of mean is at least 1/ polylog(n). We note that if the algorithm can be further improved to work with a mean value that is a sufficiently small 1/poly(n), it will disprove a central conjecture for quantum supremacy. Our algorithm is also much simpler and has a better and flexible trade-off for running time. The running time can be quasi-polynomial in both n and 1/∊, or PTAS (polynomial in n but exponential in 1/∊), where ∊ is the approximation parameter. Zheng-Feng Ji, Zhihan Jin, Pinyan Lu |
SODA | 2 |
| 2020 | Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient DescentabstractWe give the first superpolynomial lower bounds for learning one-layer neural networks with respect to the Gaussian distribution for a broad class of algorithms. In the regression setting, we prove that gradient descent run on any classifier with respect to square loss will fail to achieve small test error in polynomial time. Prior work held only for gradient descent run with small batch sizes and sufficiently smooth classifiers. For classification, we give a stronger result, namely that any statistical query (SQ) algorithm will fail to achieve small test error in polynomial time. Our lower bounds hold for commonly used activations such as ReLU and sigmoid. The core of our result relies on a novel construction of a simple family of neural networks that are exactly orthogonal with respect to all spherically symmetric distributions. Surbhi Goel, Aravind Gollakota, Zhihan Jin, Sushrut Karmalkar, Adam R. Klivans |
ICML | 3 |