Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shane Parr
dblp:255/5925
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 75% Reinforcement learning · 17% Motion planning and robot control · 9% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtasks · AAAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtasks · AAAI 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
mobile robot task execution |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
off-the-shelf markov planners · 0.8markov decision process · 0.8POMDP · 0.8lifted abstract markov decision process · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local ObservabilityabstractReal-world robot task planning is intractable in part due to partial observability. A common approach to reducing complexity is introducing additional structure into the decision process, such as mixed-observability, factored states, or temporally-extended actions. We propose the locally observable Markov decision process, a novel formulation that models task-level planning where uncertainty pertains to object-level attributes and where a robot has subroutines for seeking and accurately observing objects. This models sensors that are range-limited and line-of-sight—objects occluded or outside sensor range are unobserved, but the attributes of objects that fall within sensor view can be resolved via repeated observation. Our model results in a three-stage planning process: first, the robot plans using only observed objects; if that fails, it generates a target object that, if observed, could result in a feasible plan; finally, it attempts to locate and observe the target, replanning after each newly observed object. By combining LOMDPs with off-the-shelf Markov planners, we outperform state-of-the-art-solvers for both object-oriented POMDP and MDP analogues with the same task specification. We then apply the formulation to successfully solve a task on a mobile robot. Max Merlin, Shane Parr, Neev Parikh, Sergio Orozco, Vedant Gupta, Eric Rosen, George Dimitri Konidaris |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2021 | Agent-Aware State Estimation in Autonomous VehiclesabstractAutonomous systems often operate in environments where the behavior of multiple agents is coordinated by a shared global state. Reliable estimation of the global state is thus critical for successfully operating in a multi-agent setting. We introduce agent-aware state estimation—a framework for calculating indirect estimations of state given observations of the behavior of other agents in the environment. We also introduce transition-independent agent-aware state estimation—a tractable class of agent-aware state estimation—and show that it allows the speed of inference to scale linearly with the number of agents in the environment. As an example, we model traffic light classification in instances of complete loss of direct observation. By taking into account observations of vehicular behavior from multiple directions of traffic, our approach exhibits accuracy higher than that of existing traffic light-only HMM methods on a real-world autonomous vehicle data set under a variety of simulated occlusion scenarios. Shane Parr, Ishan Khatri, Justin Svegliato, Shlomo Zilberstein |
IROS | 1 |
| 2020 | Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable SubtasksabstractWe introduce an algorithm for model-based hierarchical reinforcement learning to acquire self-contained transition and reward models suitable for probabilistic planning at multiple levels of abstraction. We call this framework Planning with Abstract Learned Models (PALM). By representing subtasks symbolically using a new formal structure, the lifted abstract Markov decision process (L-AMDP), PALM learns models that are independent and modular. Through our experiments, we show how PALM integrates planning and execution, facilitating a rapid and efficient learning of abstract, hierarchical models. We also demonstrate the increased potential for learned models to be transferred to new and related tasks. John Winder, Stephanie Milani, Matthew Landen, Erebus Oh, Shane Parr, Shawn Squire, Marie desJardins, Cynthia Matuszek |
AAAI | 5 |