Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Mell
dblp:257/4980
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-7469-8974ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 34% Programming languages and type systems · 30% Compilers and program optimization · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Image recognition and object detection · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Spatial and temporal data management · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
concurrency semantics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Opportunistically Parallel Lambda Calculus · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › term rewriting
confluence |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Opportunistically Parallel Lambda Calculus · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems
evaluation strategies |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Opportunistically Parallel Lambda Calculus · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
syntax-guided synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Program Synthesis via Abstract Interpretation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
prediction sets |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PAC Prediction Sets for Large Language Models of Code · ICML 2023 |
Spatial and temporal data management
trajectory data |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesizing Trajectory Queries from Examples · CAV (1) 2023 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PAC Prediction Sets for Large Language Models of Code · ICML 2023 |
Program synthesis and code generation
programming by example |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesizing Trajectory Queries from Examples · CAV (1) 2023 |
Program analysis › static analysis
abstract interpretation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Program Synthesis via Abstract Interpretation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Program analysis › static analysis › abstract interpretation
abstract transformers |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Program Synthesis via Abstract Interpretation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesizing Trajectory Queries from Examples · CAV (1) 2023 |
Programming languages and type systems › language implementation
abstract syntax tree |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PAC Prediction Sets for Large Language Models of Code · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantitative semantics · 2.0parameter space pruning · 2.0abstract syntax tree · 1.3PAC prediction set · 1.3lambda calculus · 0.9LLM API calls · 0.9integer programming · 0.8abstract interpretation · 0.8a* search · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Opportunistically Parallel Lambda CalculusabstractScripting languages are widely used to compose external calls such as native libraries and network services. In such scripts, execution time is often dominated by waiting for these external calls, rendering traditional single-language optimizations ineffective. To address this, we propose a novel opportunistic evaluation strategy for scripting languages based on a core lambda calculus that automatically dispatches independent external calls in parallel and streams their results. We prove that our approach is confluent, ensuring that it preserves the programmer’s original intent, and that it eventually executes every external call. We implement this approach in a scripting language called Opal . We demonstrate the versatility and performance of Opal , focusing on programs that invoke heavy external computation through the use of large language models (LLMs) and other APIs. Across five scripts, we compare to several state-of-the-art baselines and show that opportunistic evaluation improves total running time (up to 6.2×) and latency (up to 12.7×) compared to standard sequential Python, while performing very close (between 1.3% and 18.5% running time overhead) to hand-tuned manually optimized asynchronous Rust. For Tree-of-Thoughts, a prominent LLM reasoning approach, we achieve a 6.2 × performance improvement over the authors’ own implementation. Stephen Mell, Konstantinos Kallas, Steve Zdancewic, Osbert Bastani |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimal Program Synthesis via Abstract InterpretationabstractWe consider the problem of synthesizing programs with numerical constants that optimize a quantitative objective, such as accuracy, over a set of input-output examples. We propose a general framework for optimal synthesis of such programs in a given domain specific language (DSL), with provable optimality guarantees. Our framework enumerates programs in a general search graph, where nodes represent subsets of concrete programs. To improve scalability, it uses A * search in conjunction with a search heuristic based on abstract interpretation; intuitively, this heuristic establishes upper bounds on the value of subtrees in the search graph, enabling the synthesizer to identify and prune subtrees that are provably suboptimal. In addition, we propose a natural strategy for constructing abstract transformers for monotonic semantics, which is a common property for components in DSLs for data classification. Finally, we implement our approach in the context of two such existing DSLs, demonstrating that our algorithm is more scalable than existing optimal synthesizers. Stephen Mell, Steve Zdancewic, Osbert Bastani |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2023 | Synthesizing Trajectory Queries from ExamplesabstractAbstract Data scientists often need to write programs to process predictions of machine learning models, such as object detections and trajectories in video data. However, writing such queries can be challenging due to the fuzzy nature of real-world data; in particular, they often include real-valued parameters that must be tuned by hand. We propose a novel framework calledQuivrthat synthesizes trajectory queries matching a given set of examples. To efficiently synthesize parameters, we introduce a novel technique for pruning the parameter space and a novel quantitative semantics that makes this more efficient. We evaluateQuivron a benchmark of 17 tasks, including several from prior work, and show both that it can synthesize accurate queries for each task and that our optimizations substantially reduce synthesis time. Stephen Mell, Favyen Bastani, Steve Zdancewic, Osbert Bastani |
CAV (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | PAC Prediction Sets for Large Language Models of CodeabstractPrediction sets have recently been shown to be a promising strategy for quantifying the uncertainty of deep neural networks in a way that provides theoretical guarantees. However, existing techniques have largely targeted settings where the space of labels is simple, so prediction sets can be arbitrary subsets of labels. For structured prediction problems where the space of labels is exponential in size, even prediction sets containing a small fraction of all labels can be exponentially large. In the context of code generation, we propose a solution that considers a restricted set of prediction sets that can compactly be represented as partial programs, which are programs with portions replaced with holes. Given a trained code generation model, our algorithm leverages a programming language's abstract syntax tree to generate a set of programs such that the correct program is in the set with high-confidence. Valuable applications of our algorithm include a Codex-style code generator with holes in uncertain parts of the generated code, which provides a partial program with theoretical guarantees. We evaluate our approach on PICARD (a T5 model for SQL semantic parsing) and Codex (a GPT model for over a dozen programming languages, including Python), demonstrating that our approach generates compact PAC prediction sets. This is the first research contribution that generates PAC prediction sets for generative code models. Adam Khakhar, Stephen Mell, Osbert Bastani |
ICML | 2 |