Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maike Basmer

dblp:257/5323 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2124-0276ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › statistical database privacy
perturbation-based protection
0.912025
Privacy-and-Utility-Aware Publishing of Schedules · AAAI 2025
Privacy and data protection › data publishing
privacy-preserving data publishing
0.912025
Privacy-and-Utility-Aware Publishing of Schedules · AAAI 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy evaluation
privacy-utility tradeoff
0.912025
Privacy-and-Utility-Aware Publishing of Schedules · AAAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming
0.312025
Privacy-and-Utility-Aware Publishing of Schedules · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perturbation functions · 1.7constraint programming · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Porifera: A Relational Approach to Conformance Checking for Object-Centric Behavioral Constraints
Maike Basmer, Radu-Dan Falcusan, Marco Montali, Matthias Weidlich 0001
CAiSE (2)1
2025 Privacy-and-Utility-Aware Publishing of Schedules
abstract
Scheduling is adopted in various domains to assign jobs to resources, such that an objective is optimized. While schedules enable the analysis of the underlying system, publishing them also incurs a privacy risk. Recently, privacy attacks on schedules have been proposed, which may reveal sensitive information on the jobs by solving an inverse scheduling problem. In this work, we study the protection against such attacks. We formulate the problem of privacy-and-utility preservation of schedules, which bounds both, the privacy leakage and the loss in the utility of the schedule due to obfuscation. We address the problem based on a set of perturbation functions for schedules, study their instantiations for standard scheduling problems, and implement privacy-and-utility-aware publishing of a schedule using constraint programming. Experiments with synthetic and real-world schedules demonstrate the feasibility, robustness, and effectiveness of our mechanism.
Maike Basmer, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Ali Kaan Tutak, Arik Senderovich, Matthias Weidlich 0001
AAAI1
2025 MANTA: Materializing Views on Event Data for Context Exploration in Process Analysis
Maike Basmer, Hannes Ueck, Dirk Fahland, Matthias Weidlich 0001
BPM1
2021 SusAF Welcomes SusApp: Tool Support for the Sustainability Awareness Framework
abstract
As sustainability increasingly gains attention, it has also found its way into the area of software engineering, with a specific emphasis on requirements engineering. The Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) proposed by Duboc et al. supports stakeholders in taking the long view at their software systems in terms of sustainability. In this paper, we propose SusApp, a web-based tool to simplify the application of the SusAF. In particular, it facilitates the documentation and visualization of effects on sustainability. To learn about the users’ perception of SusApp, we conducted two small-scale user studies that investigated the tool’s usability and usefulness. Overall, the studies showed that the tool was generally perceived positively by the participants. However, shortcomings in the usability became apparent, which have also impacted the perceived usefulness.
Maike Basmer, Timo Kehrer, Birgit Penzenstadler
RE1