Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashwin Maran
dblp:258/3082
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 80% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 20% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
counting complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023 |
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
dichotomy theorem |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph homomorphism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity
holographic algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity › holographic algorithms
matchgate |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
holographic algorithms · 0.7analytic arguments · 0.7testing-by-betting · 0.4polynomial-time algorithm · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Counting Cycles on Planar Graphs in Subexponential Time
Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran |
Algorithmica | 2 |
| 2023 | The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3abstractWe prove a complexity dichotomy theorem for counting planar graph homomorphisms of domain size 3. Given any 3 by 3 real valued symmetric matrix H defining a graph homomorphism from all planar graphs G ↦ ZH(G), we completely classify the computational complexity of this problem according to the matrix H. We show that for every H, the problem is either polynomial time computable or #P-hard. The P-time computable cases consist of precisely those that are P-time computable for general graphs (a complete classification is known) or computable by Valiant’s holographic algorithm via matchgates. We also prove several results about planar graph homomorphisms for general domain size q. The proof uses mainly analytic arguments. Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran |
STOC | 2 |
| 2022 | Counting Cycles on Planar Graphs in Subexponential Time
Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran |
COCOON | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from ObservationsabstractWe study the problem of efficiently estimating the effect of an intervention on a single variable using observational samples. Our goal is to give algorithms with polynomial time and sample complexity in a non-parametric setting. Tian and Pearl (AAAI ’02) have exactly characterized the class of causal graphs for which causal effects of atomic interventions can be identified from observational data. We make their result quantitative. Suppose 𝒫 is a causal model on a set V of n observable variables with respect to a given causal graph G, and let do(x) be an identifiable intervention on a variable X. We show that assuming that G has bounded in-degree and bounded c-components (k) and that the observational distribution satisfies a strong positivity condition: (i) [Evaluation] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 an evaluator for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The evaluator can return in O(n) time the probability P^(v) for any assignment v to V. (ii) [Sampling] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 a sampler for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The sampler returns an iid sample from P^ with probability 1 in O(n) time. We extend our techniques to estimate P(Y | do(x)) for a subset Y of variables of interest. We also show lower bounds for the sample complexity, demonstrating that our sample complexity has optimal dependence on the parameters n and eps, as well as if k=1 on the strong positivity parameter. Arnab Bhattacharyya 0001, Sutanu Gayen, Saravanan Kandasamy 0002, Ashwin Maran, N. V. Vinodchandran |
ICML | 4 |