Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ashwin Maran

dblp:258/3082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 80% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 20%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
counting complexity
0.712023
The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
dichotomy theorem
0.712023
The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph homomorphism
0.712023
The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023
Computational complexity › counting complexity
holographic algorithms
0.712023
The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023
Computational complexity › counting complexity › holographic algorithms
matchgate
0.712023
The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3 · STOC 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation
0.412020
Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.412020
Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.412020
Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

holographic algorithms · 0.7analytic arguments · 0.7testing-by-betting · 0.4polynomial-time algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Counting Cycles on Planar Graphs in Subexponential Time
Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran
Algorithmica2
2023 The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3
abstract
We prove a complexity dichotomy theorem for counting planar graph homomorphisms of domain size 3. Given any 3 by 3 real valued symmetric matrix H defining a graph homomorphism from all planar graphs G ↦ ZH(G), we completely classify the computational complexity of this problem according to the matrix H. We show that for every H, the problem is either polynomial time computable or #P-hard. The P-time computable cases consist of precisely those that are P-time computable for general graphs (a complete classification is known) or computable by Valiant’s holographic algorithm via matchgates. We also prove several results about planar graph homomorphisms for general domain size q. The proof uses mainly analytic arguments.
Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran
STOC2
2022 Counting Cycles on Planar Graphs in Subexponential Time
Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran
COCOON2
2020 Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations
abstract
We study the problem of efficiently estimating the effect of an intervention on a single variable using observational samples. Our goal is to give algorithms with polynomial time and sample complexity in a non-parametric setting. Tian and Pearl (AAAI ’02) have exactly characterized the class of causal graphs for which causal effects of atomic interventions can be identified from observational data. We make their result quantitative. Suppose 𝒫 is a causal model on a set V of n observable variables with respect to a given causal graph G, and let do(x) be an identifiable intervention on a variable X. We show that assuming that G has bounded in-degree and bounded c-components (k) and that the observational distribution satisfies a strong positivity condition: (i) [Evaluation] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 an evaluator for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The evaluator can return in O(n) time the probability P^(v) for any assignment v to V. (ii) [Sampling] There is an algorithm that outputs with probability 2/3 a sampler for a distribution P^ that satisfies TV(P(V | do(x)), P^(V)) < eps using m=O (n/eps^2) samples from P and O(mn) time. The sampler returns an iid sample from P^ with probability 1 in O(n) time. We extend our techniques to estimate P(Y | do(x)) for a subset Y of variables of interest. We also show lower bounds for the sample complexity, demonstrating that our sample complexity has optimal dependence on the parameters n and eps, as well as if k=1 on the strong positivity parameter.
Arnab Bhattacharyya 0001, Sutanu Gayen, Saravanan Kandasamy 0002, Ashwin Maran, N. V. Vinodchandran
ICML4