Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alper Çakan
dblp:258/3192
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
8as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3567-1704ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 8 · 8 first-author · 8 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital rights management
copy-protection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography
quantum copy-protection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing Measurements · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 |
Software testing › deep learning testing
deep learning system testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020 |
Software testing › test adequacy
test adequacy criteria |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial example generation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Multi-copy Security in Quantum Cryptography and More
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi Yamakawa |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2026 | How to Delete Without a Trace: Certified Deniability in a Quantum World
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Justin Raizes |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2026 | Public-Key Quantum Fire and Key-Fire From Classical Oracles
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Omri Shmueli |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2026 | Anonymous Public-Key Quantum Money and Universally Verifiable Quantum Voting
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Takashi Yamakawa |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2026 | How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing Measurements
Alper Çakan, Dakshita Khurana, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa, Kabir Tomer, Takashi Yamakawa |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Unclonable Cryptography with Unbounded Collusions and Impossibility of Hyperefficient Shadow Tomography
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal |
TCC (3) | 1 |
| 2024 | Unbounded Leakage-Resilience and Intrusion-Detection in a Quantum World
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Chen-Da Liu-Zhang, João Ribeiro 0002 |
TCC (2) | 1 |
| 2020 | Importance-driven deep learning system testingabstractDeep Learning (DL) systems are key enablers for engineering intelligent applications due to their ability to solve complex tasks such as image recognition and machine translation. Nevertheless, using DL systems in safety- and security-critical applications requires to provide testing evidence for their dependable operation. Recent research in this direction focuses on adapting testing criteria from traditional software engineering as a means of increasing confidence for their correct behaviour. However, they are inadequate in capturing the intrinsic properties exhibited by these systems. We bridge this gap by introducing DeepImportance, a systematic testing methodology accompanied by an Importance-Driven (IDC) test adequacy criterion for DL systems. Applying IDC enables to establish a layer-wise functional understanding of the importance of DL system components and use this information to assess the semantic diversity of a test set. Our empirical evaluation on several DL systems, across multiple DL datasets and with state-of-the-art adversarial generation techniques demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of DeepImportance and its ability to support the engineering of more robust DL systems. Simos Gerasimou, Hasan Ferit Eniser, Alper Sen 0001, Alper Çakan |
ICSE | 4 |