Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alper Çakan

dblp:258/3192 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
8as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3567-1704ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 8 · 8 first-author · 8 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital rights management
copy-protection
1.012026
How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography
quantum copy-protection
1.012026
How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography
1.012026
On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing Measurements · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026
Software testing › deep learning testing
deep learning system testing
0.412020
Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020
Software testing › test adequacy
test adequacy criteria
0.412020
Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112020
Importance-driven deep learning system testing · ICSE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial example generation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Multi-copy Security in Quantum Cryptography and More
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi Yamakawa
CRYPTO (5)1
2026 How to Delete Without a Trace: Certified Deniability in a Quantum World
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Justin Raizes
CRYPTO (5)1
2026 Public-Key Quantum Fire and Key-Fire From Classical Oracles
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Omri Shmueli
CRYPTO (5)1
2026 Anonymous Public-Key Quantum Money and Universally Verifiable Quantum Voting
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Takashi Yamakawa
CRYPTO (5)1
2026 How to Copy-Protect Malleable-Puncturable Cryptographic Functionalities Under Arbitrary Challenge Distributions: A Unified Solution to Quantum Protection
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal
EUROCRYPT (1)1
2026 On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing Measurements
Alper Çakan, Dakshita Khurana, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa, Kabir Tomer, Takashi Yamakawa
EUROCRYPT (1)1
2024 Unclonable Cryptography with Unbounded Collusions and Impossibility of Hyperefficient Shadow Tomography
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal
TCC (3)1
2024 Unbounded Leakage-Resilience and Intrusion-Detection in a Quantum World
Alper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Chen-Da Liu-Zhang, João Ribeiro 0002
TCC (2)1
2020 Importance-driven deep learning system testing
abstract
Deep Learning (DL) systems are key enablers for engineering intelligent applications due to their ability to solve complex tasks such as image recognition and machine translation. Nevertheless, using DL systems in safety- and security-critical applications requires to provide testing evidence for their dependable operation. Recent research in this direction focuses on adapting testing criteria from traditional software engineering as a means of increasing confidence for their correct behaviour. However, they are inadequate in capturing the intrinsic properties exhibited by these systems. We bridge this gap by introducing DeepImportance, a systematic testing methodology accompanied by an Importance-Driven (IDC) test adequacy criterion for DL systems. Applying IDC enables to establish a layer-wise functional understanding of the importance of DL system components and use this information to assess the semantic diversity of a test set. Our empirical evaluation on several DL systems, across multiple DL datasets and with state-of-the-art adversarial generation techniques demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of DeepImportance and its ability to support the engineering of more robust DL systems.
Simos Gerasimou, Hasan Ferit Eniser, Alper Sen 0001, Alper Çakan
ICSE4