Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhezheng Luo

dblp:258/3621 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 49% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 18%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
0.712023
Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructions · AAAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › machine learning for planning
subgoal learning
0.712023
Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructions · AAAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.512021
Temporal and Object Quantification Networks · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.212023
Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructions · AAAI 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.212023
Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructions · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

binary classifier · 0.7a* · 0.7RRT · 0.7neuro-symbolic networks · 0.5finite-domain quantification · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructions
abstract
We present a framework for learning useful subgoals that support efficient long-term planning to achieve novel goals. At the core of our framework is a collection of rational subgoals (RSGs), which are essentially binary classifiers over the environmental states. RSGs can be learned from weakly-annotated data, in the form of unsegmented demonstration trajectories, paired with abstract task descriptions, which are composed of terms initially unknown to the agent (e.g., collect-wood then craft-boat then go-across-river). Our framework also discovers dependencies between RSGs, e.g., the task collect-wood is a helpful subgoal for the task craft-boat. Given a goal description, the learned subgoals and the derived dependencies facilitate off-the-shelf planning algorithms, such as A* and RRT, by setting helpful subgoals as waypoints to the planner, which significantly improves performance-time efficiency. Project page: https://rsg.csail.mit.edu
Zhezheng Luo, Jiayuan Mao, Jiajun Wu 0001, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Josh Tenenbaum, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
AAAI1
2021 Temporal and Object Quantification Networks
abstract
We present Temporal and Object Quantification Networks (TOQ-Nets), a new class of neuro-symbolic networks with a structural bias that enables them to learn to recognize complex relational-temporal events. This is done by including reasoning layers that implement finite-domain quantification over objects and time. The structure allows them to generalize directly to input instances with varying numbers of objects in temporal sequences of varying lengths. We evaluate TOQ-Nets on input domains that require recognizing event-types in terms of complex temporal relational patterns. We demonstrate that TOQ-Nets can generalize from small amounts of data to scenarios containing more objects than were present during training and to temporal warpings of input sequences.
Jiayuan Mao, Zhezheng Luo, Chuang Gan 0001, Josh Tenenbaum, Jiajun Wu 0001, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomer D. Ullman
IJCAI2