Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jari Järvi

dblp:258/3642 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412020
Projective Preferential Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
preferential bayesian optimization
0.412020
Projective Preferential Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020
Human-robot interaction
preference learning
0.112020
Projective Preferential Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projective queries · 0.9preferential queries · 0.9bayesian optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Projective Preferential Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Bayesian optimization is an effective method for finding extrema of a black-box function. We propose a new type of Bayesian optimization for learning user preferences in high-dimensional spaces. The central assumption is that the underlying objective function cannot be evaluated directly, but instead a minimizer along a projection can be queried, which we call a projective preferential query. The form of the query allows for feedback that is natural for a human to give, and which enables interaction. This is demonstrated in a user experiment in which the user feedback comes in the form of optimal position and orientation of a molecule adsorbing to a surface. We demonstrate that our framework is able to find a global minimum of a high-dimensional black-box function, which is an infeasible task for existing preferential Bayesian optimization frameworks that are based on pairwise comparisons.
Petrus Mikkola, Milica Todorovic, Jari Järvi, Patrick Rinke, Samuel Kaski
ICML3