Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Calin Cruceru
dblp:259/1476
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 77% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Computationally Tractable Riemannian Manifolds for Graph Embeddings · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
non-euclidean representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Computationally Tractable Riemannian Manifolds for Graph Embeddings · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riemannian optimization · 0.5geodesic distance · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Computationally Tractable Riemannian Manifolds for Graph EmbeddingsabstractRepresenting graphs as sets of node embeddings in certain curved Riemannian manifolds has recently gained momentum in machine learning due to their desirable geometric inductive biases (e.g., hierarchical structures benefit from hyperbolic geometry). However, going beyond embedding spaces of constant sectional curvature, while potentially more representationally powerful, proves to be challenging as one can easily lose the appeal of computationally tractable tools such as geodesic distances or Riemannian gradients. Here, we explore two computationally efficient matrix manifolds, showcasing how to learn and optimize graph embeddings in these Riemannian spaces. Empirically, we demonstrate consistent improvements over Euclidean geometry while often outperforming hyperbolic and elliptical embeddings based on various metrics that capture different graph properties. Our results serve as new evidence for the benefits of non-Euclidean embeddings in machine learning pipelines. Calin Cruceru, Gary Bécigneul, Octavian-Eugen Ganea |
AAAI | 1 |