Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex Luedtke

dblp:259/3026 · also Alexander Luedtke · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9936-3236ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 31% Trustworthy machine learning · 27%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees
0.912025
Stochastic Gradients under Nuisances · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods
0.912025
Stochastic Gradients under Nuisances · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.712023
Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.712023
Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
0.712023
Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › minimax optimality
minimax optimal prediction
0.512021
Adversarial Monte Carlo Meta-Learning of Optimal Prediction Procedures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.212023
Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

permutation invariance · 1.0equivariant neural network · 1.0adversarial monte carlo · 1.0orthogonalized gradient · 0.9neyman orthogonality · 0.9isotonic regression · 0.7doubly robust estimation · 0.7cross-fitting · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Stochastic Gradients under Nuisances
abstract
Stochastic gradient optimization is the dominant learning paradigm for a variety of scenarios, from classical supervised learning to modern self-supervised learning. We consider stochastic gradient algorithms for learning problems whose objectives rely on unknown nuisance parameters, and establish non-asymptotic convergence guarantees. Our results show that, while the presence of a nuisance can alter the optimum and upset the optimization trajectory, the classical stochastic gradient algorithm may still converge under appropriate conditions, such as Neyman orthogonality. Moreover, even when Neyman orthogonality is not satisfied, we also show that an algorithm variant with approximately orthogonalized updates (with an approximately orthogonalized gradient oracle) may achieve similar convergence rates. Examples from orthogonal statistical learning/double machine learning and causal inference are discussed.
Facheng Yu, Ronak Mehta, Alex Luedtke, Zaïd Harchaoui
NeurIPS3
2023 Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
abstract
We propose causal isotonic calibration, a novel nonparametric method for calibrating predictors of heterogeneous treatment effects. Furthermore, we introduce cross-calibration, a data-efficient variant of calibration that eliminates the need for hold-out calibration sets. Cross-calibration leverages cross-fitted predictors and generates a single calibrated predictor using all available data. Under weak conditions that do not assume monotonicity, we establish that both causal isotonic calibration and cross-calibration achieve fast doubly-robust calibration rates, as long as either the propensity score or outcome regression is estimated accurately in a suitable sense. The proposed causal isotonic calibrator can be wrapped around any black-box learning algorithm, providing robust and distribution-free calibration guarantees while preserving predictive performance.
Lars van der Laan, Ernesto Ulloa-Pérez, Marco Carone, Alex Luedtke
ICML4
2021 Adversarial Monte Carlo Meta-Learning of Optimal Prediction Procedures
abstract
We frame the meta-learning of prediction procedures as a search for an optimal strategy in a two-player game. In this game, Nature selects a prior over distributions that generate labeled data consisting of features and an associated outcome, and the Predictor observes data sampled from a distribution drawn from this prior. The Predictor's objective is to learn a function that maps from a new feature to an estimate of the associated outcome. We establish that, under reasonable conditions, the Predictor has an optimal strategy that is equivariant to shifts and rescalings of the outcome and is invariant to permutations of the observations and to shifts, rescalings, and permutations of the features. We introduce a neural network architecture that satisfies these properties. The proposed strategy performs favorably compared to standard practice in both parametric and nonparametric experiments.
Alex Luedtke, Incheoul Chung, Oleg Sofrygin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2019 Asymptotically optimal algorithms for budgeted multiple play bandits
Alex Luedtke, Emilie Kaufmann, Antoine Chambaz
Mach. Learn.1