Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex Luedtke
dblp:259/3026 · also Alexander Luedtke
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9936-3236ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 31% Trustworthy machine learning · 27% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stochastic Gradients under Nuisances · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stochastic Gradients under Nuisances · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › minimax optimality
minimax optimal prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Adversarial Monte Carlo Meta-Learning of Optimal Prediction Procedures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
permutation invariance · 1.0equivariant neural network · 1.0adversarial monte carlo · 1.0orthogonalized gradient · 0.9neyman orthogonality · 0.9isotonic regression · 0.7doubly robust estimation · 0.7cross-fitting · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Stochastic Gradients under NuisancesabstractStochastic gradient optimization is the dominant learning paradigm for a variety of scenarios, from classical supervised learning to modern self-supervised learning. We consider stochastic gradient algorithms for learning problems whose objectives rely on unknown nuisance parameters, and establish non-asymptotic convergence guarantees. Our results show that, while the presence of a nuisance can alter the optimum and upset the optimization trajectory, the classical stochastic gradient algorithm may still converge under appropriate conditions, such as Neyman orthogonality. Moreover, even when Neyman orthogonality is not satisfied, we also show that an algorithm variant with approximately orthogonalized updates (with an approximately orthogonalized gradient oracle) may achieve similar convergence rates. Examples from orthogonal statistical learning/double machine learning and causal inference are discussed. Facheng Yu, Ronak Mehta, Alex Luedtke, Zaïd Harchaoui |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Causal Isotonic Calibration for Heterogeneous Treatment EffectsabstractWe propose causal isotonic calibration, a novel nonparametric method for calibrating predictors of heterogeneous treatment effects. Furthermore, we introduce cross-calibration, a data-efficient variant of calibration that eliminates the need for hold-out calibration sets. Cross-calibration leverages cross-fitted predictors and generates a single calibrated predictor using all available data. Under weak conditions that do not assume monotonicity, we establish that both causal isotonic calibration and cross-calibration achieve fast doubly-robust calibration rates, as long as either the propensity score or outcome regression is estimated accurately in a suitable sense. The proposed causal isotonic calibrator can be wrapped around any black-box learning algorithm, providing robust and distribution-free calibration guarantees while preserving predictive performance. Lars van der Laan, Ernesto Ulloa-Pérez, Marco Carone, Alex Luedtke |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Adversarial Monte Carlo Meta-Learning of Optimal Prediction ProceduresabstractWe frame the meta-learning of prediction procedures as a search for an optimal strategy in a two-player game. In this game, Nature selects a prior over distributions that generate labeled data consisting of features and an associated outcome, and the Predictor observes data sampled from a distribution drawn from this prior. The Predictor's objective is to learn a function that maps from a new feature to an estimate of the associated outcome. We establish that, under reasonable conditions, the Predictor has an optimal strategy that is equivariant to shifts and rescalings of the outcome and is invariant to permutations of the observations and to shifts, rescalings, and permutations of the features. We introduce a neural network architecture that satisfies these properties. The proposed strategy performs favorably compared to standard practice in both parametric and nonparametric experiments. Alex Luedtke, Incheoul Chung, Oleg Sofrygin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | Asymptotically optimal algorithms for budgeted multiple play bandits
Alex Luedtke, Emilie Kaufmann, Antoine Chambaz |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |