Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alina Klerings
dblp:259/6049
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › representation engineering
concept steering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Language Models in Multi-Token Generation: A Case Study on Tense and Aspect · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Language Models in Multi-Token Generation: A Case Study on Tense and Aspect · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
linguistic knowledge in language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Steering Language Models in Multi-Token Generation: A Case Study on Tense and Aspect · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear discriminant analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Steering Language Models in Multi-Token Generation: A Case Study on Tense and AspectabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are able to generate grammatically well-formed text, but how do they encode their syntactic knowledge internally?While prior work has focused largely on binary grammatical contrasts, in this work, we study the representation and control of two multidimensional hierarchical grammar phenomena-verb tense and aspect-and for each, identify distinct, orthogonal directions in residual space using linear discriminant analysis.Next, we demonstrate causal control over both grammatical features through concept steering across three generation tasks.Then, we use these identified features in a case study to investigate factors influencing effective steering in multi-token generation.We find that steering strength, location, and duration are crucial parameters for reducing undesirable side effects such as topic shift and degeneration.Our findings suggest that models encode tense and aspect in structurally organized, human-like ways, but effective control of such features during generation is sensitive to multiple factors and requires manual tuning or automated optimization.1 Alina Klerings, Jannik Brinkmann, Daniel Ruffinelli, Simone Paolo Ponzetto |
EMNLP | 1 |